DESAIN MODEL STEM-FC PADA PERKULIAHAN GEOSAINS

Didit Ardianto; Anna Permanasari; Harry Firman; Taufik Ramlan Ramalis

doi:10.33751/jsep.v3i1.2738

DESAIN MODEL STEM-FC PADA PERKULIAHAN GEOSAINS

Didit Ardianto, Anna Permanasari, Harry Firman, Taufik Ramlan Ramalis

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tentang desian STEM-FC yang dikembangkan pada perkuliahan geosains bagi mahasiswa calon guru. Pengembangan dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode developmental research. Namun, pada artikel ini tidak membahas secara keseluruhan tahapan pengembangan. Pembahasan difokuskan pada tahap developing yang menitik beratkan pada uji coba model. Partisipan yang terlibat yaitu 25 mahasiswa calon guru SD yang sedang mengikuti perkuliahan ilmu bumi dan antariksa. Desain STEM-FC yang dikembangkan mampu memfasilitasi mahasiswa untuk belajar secara aktif. Selain itu desain perkuliahan yang dikembangkan juga membuat mahasiswa menjai antusias dalam belajar geosains.

Keywords

STEM-FC, Geosains

References

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project Based Learning Integrated to STEM to Enhance Elementary Schools Students Scientific Literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(2), 261267.

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunity. Arlington, VI: National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) Press.

Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28(23), 165178.

Capraro, R. ., & Slough, S. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? an Introduction to STEM Project-Based Learning. In: Capraro R.M., Capraro M.M., Morgan J.R. (eds) STEM Project-Based Learning. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

Clark, L., Majumdar, S., Bhattacharjee, J., & Hanks, A. C. (2015). Creating an Atmosphere for STEM Literacy in the Rural South Through Student-Collected Weather Data. Journal of Geoscience Education, 115, 105115.

Dohn, N. B. (2013). Situational Interest in Engineering Design Activities. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 3741.

Firman, H. (2015). Pendidikan STEM. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA dan PKLH, Universitas Pakkuan (pp. 19).

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95105.

Geological Society of America. (2016). The Importance of Teaching Earth Science. Retrieved from http://www.geosociety.org accessed on 20-03-2019

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.). In , Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Differently : The Impact Of Student Factors. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

Lou, S.-J., Tsai, H.-Y., Tseng, K.-H., & Shih, R.-C. (2014). Effects of Implementing STEM-I Project-Based Learning Activities for Female High School Students. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 12(1), 5273

Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282293.

Marulcu, I. (2015). Teaching habitat and animal classification to fourth graders using an engineering-design mode. Research in Science & Technological Education. 3741.

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: An Introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational Design Research (p. 11). Enschede.

National Academy of Sciences. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas Committee. Washington, DC 20055; The National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2011). Successful K12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC 20055: National Academies Press.

OToole, J. M., & Absalom, D. J. (2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: is there room on the horse for two? Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 179190.

Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology and Society, 3(2), 5060.

Tseng, K. H., Chang, C. C., Lou, S. J., & Chen, W. P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87102.

Voos, R. (2003). Blended learningdwhat is it and where might it take us? Sloan-C View, 2(1), 25.

Wagner, T. P., Mccormick, K., & Martinez, D. M. (2015). Fostering STEM literacy through a tabletop wind turbine environmental science laboratory activity. Journal Environmental Study of Science.

Yacobucci, M. M. (2013). Integrating Critical Thinking About Values Into an Introductory Geoscience Course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 363, 351363.

Yuen. T.T., Boekcing, M., Tiger, E.P., Gomez, A., Arreguin, A., & Stone, J. (2014). Group tasks, activities, dynamics and interaction in collaborative robotics projects with elementary and middle school children. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 39-45

Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jsep.v3i1.2738