The Impact of Earthworm Biopore Holes on Groundwater Absorption

Widyawati Widyawati

Abstract


which is in nature both ossifying and closing ground surface, causes the decline of ground water infiltration. Some efforts to enlarge ground water infiltration have already been done, for example, by making infiltration wells and bioporic infiltration holes. Earthworms naturally do some activities which contribute to make ground water infiltrate. Due to this fact, a research needs conducting on bioporic infiltration holes of earthworms. This research was performed in Sukoharjo, Surakarta from September 2007 up to July 2008. The study aimed to search the diameter and amount of width units of bioporic infiltration holes of earthworms. The number of infiltration holes of earthworms was counted on the basis of measurement plots of 50 cm x 50 cm. The plots, 20 in number, were placed on a piece of land randomly. Each hole of earthworms (biopore) in every plot was measured to find its diameter. The result of the research showed that the average diameter of bioporic infiltration holes of earthworms was 4,58 mm, and there were 20 holes found in every square meter of land. The bioporic infiltration holes of earthworm could extend the infiltration area of ground water as many as 873 times.

Keywords


earthworms; bioporic; ground water; biopore

References


Antara. 2008. Jakarta Terapkan Konsep 5R Untuk Pelestarian Air Tanah. http://www.antara.co.id/view/?i=1205234187&c=WBM&s=. Download 23

Januari 2009

Bohlen, P.J. 2002. Earthworm. Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Marcel Dekker Inc. Florida USA.

Brata, K.R. dan A. Nelistya. 2002. Lubang Resapan Biopori. Penebar Swadaya Jakarta

DKI Jakarta. 2005. Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Jakarta No: 68 Tahun 2005. tentang Perubahan Keputusan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Perubahan Keputusan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Jakarta Nomor 115 tahun 2001 tentang Pembuatan Sumur Resapan. Pemerintah Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibu Kota Jakarta.

Flury, M. and H. Fluhler. 1994. Susceptibility of Soil to Prefential Flow of Water: A Field Study. Water Resources Research. 30(70): 1945-1954.

Hanafiah, K.A., I. Anas, A. Napoleon dan N. Ghoffar. 2005. Biologi Tanah. Ekologi dan Mikrobiologi Tanah. PT.Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta

Handayanto, N. dan K. Hairah, 2007. Biologi Tanah. Penerbit Pustaka Adipura. Yogyakarta

Hardin, B. 1991. Do Earthworm Affect Grownwater ?. Agricultural Research. http://findarticle.com/p/aticle/mi_m3741/is_n4_v39/a1_11168304.

Download 12-12-2008

Kompas. 2007. Penyelamatan DKI Gerakan Sumur Resapan Mulai dari Halaman Istana. http://64.203.71.11/kompas-cetak/0702/12/daerah/3308661.htm. Download 21Maret 2008

Murie, O.J. 1874. A Field Guide to Animal Track. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.

NRRI.(Natural Resources Research Institute). 2006. Earthworm Ecological Groups. The University of Minnesota Duluth. http://www.nrri.umn.edu/worms/identification/ecology_groups.html Download 12-12-2008

Tim Biopori IPB.2007.Lubang Resapan Biopori (LRB). http://www.biopori.com/resapan_biopori.php Download 4 April 2008

Rukmana, R. 1999. Budidaya Cacing Tanah. Penerbit Kanisius. Yogyakarta. Whitten, T, R.E. Soeriaatmadja, dan S.A. Afiff. 1999. Ekologi Jawa dan Bali.

Prenhalindo: Jakarta.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jsi.v6i2.10636

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.