Metacognitive Strategy on Students Literal and Inferential Comprehension in L2 Reading

Ninda Oktaviana Putri, Entis Sutisna, Asih Wahyuni

Abstract


Reading is one skill that should be master by the students who want to learn English. However, students often find difficulties while learning English. To solve the problem, students should mastered four language English skills, and one of them is Reading. However, based on the preliminary data taken by the Researcher, it shows that students often did not know what they read. They are not aware of their own reading process. To solve this problem, the students need to know what kind of strategy that they should use while reading. The appropriate strategy that student should use when read is the metacognitive strategy. This paper entitled Metacognitive strategy on students literal and inferential comprehension is conducted to know what kind of metacognitive strategy used on students reading comprehension, especially their literal and inferential. The aims of this study are to know what kind of metacognitive strategy used on students literal and inferential comprehension skills in L2 reading and how are the use of metacognitive strategy on students literal and inferential comprehension to their reading skill. There were 3 strategy subscales or factors; Global Reading Strategies, Problem-Solving Strategies and Support Reading Strategies. Results revealed that participants reported frequent use the third metacognitive-strategy types stated by Mokhtari. K And Reichard. The method of this research is qualitative research. It takes place at Pakuan University. The population of this study were Fifth-semester students of the English language Education study program. While the sample of this research are students from class A and Class D that consists of 37 students. The technique and instruments of collecting data for this research are questionnaires, interviews, and forum group discussions. In conclusion, the result shows that the students use metacognitive strategy in their reading process.

Keywords


Metacognitive Strategy; Literal Comprehension; Inferential comprehension; Reading

References


Aflah, M. N. 2017. The Role of Metacognition in Reading Comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Vol 6 No.1, 10-22.

Ahmadi, M. R. 2013. The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, Vol 6 No. 10, ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916 4750.

Ay, Sila. 2009. Academic Reading Strategy and Metacognitive Awareness of University Students. Essay on Turkish Linguistics.

Baker, L. 2002. Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford Press

Berry, J. 2005. Levels of reading comprehension.

Brown, H. Douglas.2000.Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Fransisco: San Fransisco State University.

C.R. Kothari. 2004. Research Methodology Methods and Techniques Second Revised Edition, India:University of Rajasthan Jaipur.

Creswell, John. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches: Sage.

Dafiyanti, Sri,. Endang Susilawati dkk The Correlation Between Students Reading Strategies And Their Reading Comprehension Ability In Reading Academic Text, Pontianak. English Education Study Program, Teacher Training and Education Faculty of Tanjungpura University.

Flavell, J. H. 1976. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry

Hacker, D. J, Dunlosky, L, and Graesser, A. C. 2009. Handbook of metacognition in Education. New York and London : Routledge Taylor & Francis Group

Harmer, Jeremy. 2015. The Practice of English Language Teaching (fifth edition). England: Pearson.

Iwai, Y. 2011. The Effects of Metacognitive Reading Strategies: Pedagogical Implications for EFL/ESL Teachers.

Li Lai,Ya. Jung Tung, Yu. Ying Luo, Shu. 2008. Theory of Reading Strategies and its Application by EFL Learners: Reflections on Two Case Studies. Taipei. Taipei Municipal University of Education.

Mokhtari, K. and Reichard, C. A. 2002. Assessing students metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2),249-259

Mokhtari, Kouider and Carla A. Reichard. 2002. Assessing Students Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Oklahoma State University, Journal of Educational Psychology.

Mokhtari, Kouider and Carla A. Reichard. 2002. Assessing Students Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Oklahoma State University, Journal of Educational Psychology.

Ratna S, Anne. 2014. The Use of Cognitive Reading Strategies to Enhance EFL Students' Reading Comprehension. Indonesia, STKIP Garut.

Reza Ahmadi Gilani, Mohammad. 2012. Impacts of Learning Reading Strategy on Students Reading Comprehension Proficiency, The international Juornal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 1(1), Copyright IJLLALW, Norway.

Richards, Jack C and Richards Schmidt. 2002. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and applied Linguistic, 3rd Ed., London : Pearson Education Limited.

Suhadi, 2016. Exploring Literal and Inferential Reading Comprehension on Eight Grade. Students. Unpublishing Thesis. Cirebon: Syekh Nurjati Islamic Institut

Pennell, D. 2002. Explicit instruction for Implicit meaning : Strategies for teaching inferential reading comprehension.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55215/pedagogia.v13i2.4506 Abstract views : 598 views : 376

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ninda Oktaviana Putri, Entis Sutisna, Asih Wahyuni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.