Example Non-Example Method: Students' Learning Outcomes Improvement Regarding Adding and Subtracting Two Fractions with Different Denouncors in Mathematics Subjects

Eulis Mardiani

Abstract


This research departed from the phenomenon that occurs in the classroom, namely the low understanding and learning outcomes of students in mathematics learning about adding and subtracting two fractions with different denominators using the example non example learning model. Therefore, a teacher needs to consider learning strategies so that they can improve student learning outcomes. This research aims (1) to find out that the example non example learning model can improve students' learning outcomes regarding addition and subtraction of two fractions with different denominators in sixth grader of elementary school. (2) to describe the process of improving student learning outcomes regarding addition and subtraction of two fractions with different denominators before and after using the example non example learning model in sixth grader of elementary school. (3) to measure the magnitude of the increase in students' learning outcomes regarding addition and subtraction of two fractions with different denominators after using the example non example learning model in sixth grader of elementary school. The results of this research show that using the example non-example learning model can be a fun learning variation for students so that it is proven to improve students’ learning outcomes. Before using the example non example learning model, student learning outcomes only reached an average score of 64.10, then there was an increase after using the example non example learning model to 73.08 in cycle 1 and 81.28 in second cycle. From the description above, the researcher concludes that the use of the example non example learning model which is adapted to the learning material can create a pleasant learning situation resulting in an increase in student learning outcomes. Therefore, researchers suggests that the use of the example non-example learning model be socialized and used as an alternative in mathematics learning in schools.

Keywords


Example non-example learning model, Student learning outcomes, Mathematics subjects

References


Ahmad, N., & Junaini, S. (2020). Augmented reality for learning mathematics: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(16), 106-122.

Cai, S., Liu, E., Shen, Y., Liu, C., Li, S., & Shen, Y. (2023). Probability learning in mathematics using augmented reality: impact on students' learning gains and attitudes. In Cross Reality (XR) and Immersive Learning Environments (ILEs) in Education (pp. 22-35). Routledge.

Chao, W. H., & Chang, R. C. (2018). Using augmented reality to enhance and engage students in learning mathematics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(12), 455-464.

Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., Van Bendegem, J. P., Bicudo, M., Miarka, R., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (2016). The philosophy of mathematics education. Springer Nature.

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and teacher education, 86, 102882.

Fernandez-Rio, J., Sanz, N., Fernandez-Cando, J., & Santos, L. (2017). Impact of a sustained Cooperative Learning intervention on student motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 22(1), 89-105.

Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and social studies, 10(4), 16-37.

Hendrycks, D., Burns, C., Kadavath, S., Arora, A., Basart, S., Tang, E., ... & Steinhardt, J. (2021). Measuring mathematical problem solving with the math dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03874.

Jesionkowska, J., Wild, F., & Deval, Y. (2020). Active learning augmented reality for STEAM education—A case study. Education Sciences, 10(8), 198.

Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 54(5), 586-614.

Lombardi, D., Shipley, T. F., & Astronomy Team, Biology Team, Chemistry Team, Engineering Team, Geography Team, Geoscience Team, and Physics Team. (2021). The curious construct of active learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 22(1), 8-43.

Marcos, R. I. S., Fernández, V. L., González, M. T. D., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663.

Phonapichat, P., Wongwanich, S., & Sujiva, S. (2014). An analysis of elementary school students’ difficulties in mathematical problem solving. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 116, 3169-3174.

Razak, F. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning on mathematics learning outcomes viewed from students’ learning motivation. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(1), 49-55.

Whitehead, A. N. (2017). An introduction to mathematics. Courier Dover Publications.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55215/pedagogia.v16i1.9660 Abstract views : 50 views : 16

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Eulis Mardiani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.