1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 2 (2024)
  3. Kurniawan

Legal Effects Of Fiduciary Guarantee Registration In Online Systems

Deni Kurniawan, Teddy Anggoro

Abstract


Fiduciary security institutions are regulated through legislation, Act No. 42 of 1999. This law governs the obligation of the registration of fiduciary security in order to provide legal certainty to the interested parties and this fiduciary security registration gives the rights of preference to the fiduciary recipient of other creditors. In 2013, the Government issued a regulation to Administration System of Fiduciary Security Registration electronically in order to improve services to people who need legal services in the field of fiduciary security. Laws of Fiduciary Security are positive law applicable to the fiduciary security, but there are some things that are not regulated in the law, that is, the  registration done with the online system and the legal consequences that are not registered. This study used normative legal research, which explains the existence of the absence of norms in  the Law of Fiduciary Security, i.e. the registration done with the online system and the legal consequences of fiduciary security which are not registered. This study used a source of legal materials consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that registration of fiduciary security with the online system is regulated through the Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9  of 2013 concerning the electronic imposition of Fiduciary Security and Regulation of the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 10 of 2013 concerning the System for Registration of Fiduciary Security done Electronically. The legal consequence of the Agreement of Fiduciary Security which is not registered with the online system is that it does not produce the collateral agreement of the fiduciary security so that the collateral character such as droit de suite and the rights of preference is not inherent in the creditor of the grantor of the fiduciary security and it does not have the executorial power.

Keywords


fiduciary; legal consequence of registration; online system

References


R. Usman, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

H. Kamelo, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia: Suatu Kebutuhan yang Didambakan, Bandung: PT Alumni, 2018.

Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security, Government of the Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, 1999.

S. Tanuwidjaja, “Implementation of Fiduciary Security Registration: Issues and Practices,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 487–504, 2020.

S. Soekanto and P. M. Marzuki, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2019.

Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Regulation No. 9 of 2013 on Electronic Fiduciary Registration, Jakarta, 2013.

Government of Indonesia, E-Government Implementation Framework 2020–2024, Jakarta: Kemenpan-RB, 2021.

M. Kusumaatmadja, “Digital Governance in the Indonesian Legal System,” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Indonesia, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2018.

A. Prabowo, “Legal Digitalization and Bureaucratic Reform in Indonesia,” Asian Journal of Law and Society, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 332–345, 2022.

Ministry of Law and Human Rights, SISMINBAKUM Online Registration Manual, Jakarta, 2021.

D. Kurniawan and T. Anggoro, “Legal Effects of Fiduciary Guarantee Registration in Online Systems,” Journal of Social Studies, Arts and Humanities, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 35–40, 2024.

B. Simanjuntak, “Legal Consequences of Unregistered Fiduciary Guarantees in Online Systems,” Jurnal Rechtsvinding, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 77–90, 2020.

A. Rifai, Penemuan Hukum oleh Hakim dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.

Constitutional Court of Indonesia, Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, on Fiduciary Registration and Execution, Jakarta, 2019.

L. Fuller, The Morality of Law, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.

S. Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2017.

E . Schrage, “The Principle of Publicity in Property Law,” Netherlands Comparative Law Review, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 122–138, 2019.

Y. Saragih, “Digital Transformation and Legal Certainty in Indonesian Private Law,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 55–67, 2023.

G. Radbruch, Rechtsphilosophie, Stuttgart: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2016.

B. Fajar and A. Ahmad, Teori dan Filsafat Hukum: Membangun Hukum di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2018.

E. A. Simanjuntak, “Implementation of the Fiduciary Law in Indonesia: Problems and Prospects,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–48, 2021.

H. Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State, New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2017.

P. M. Marzuki, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2019.

D. A. Sihombing, “The Validity of Electronic Certificates in Fiduciary Law,” Jurnal Hukum Positum, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 145–158, 2022.

P. M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 2007.

R. Soeroso, Perlindungan Hukum dalam Perspektif Teori dan Praktik, Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2020.

Republic of Indonesia, Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (EIT Law), Jakarta, 2008.

R. Hendrawan and M. Siregar, “Publicity and Transparency in Electronic Fiduciary Registration Systems,” Jurnal Hukum & Teknologi Indonesia, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 87–101, 2023.

S. Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press, 2019.

J. Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Malang: Bayumedia, 2020.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jssah.v4i2.10607

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.