Assessing the species diversity in non-conservation areas: A first systematically camera trapping survey in Batang Angkola Landscape, North Sumatra, Indonesia
Abstract
Assessing the species diversity in non-conservation areas is crucial to understanding for conservation interventions and management. We used camera trapping to investigate the species diversity in the Batang Angkola Landscape in North Sumatra. The study on species diversity in the area was conducted in 5 months from February to June 2020. The aim of this study is to assess the species diversity in Batang Angkola landscape as a reference for the improvement of the management and policy with a special interest in proving the existence of wildlife species in the landscape. We compiled a species diversity, richness and evenness investigated conducted a test to Shannon wiener analyses. Based on 1,283 photograph at 60 camera traps stations during 2,923 trap days, we identified 27 different species (24 species are terrestrial mammals, 2 species are birds, and 1 species is reptile), including five classified as threatened according to the IUCN. Based on the calculation of the Relative Abundance Indices for each species per 100 trap days, pig-tailed macaque had the highest RAI (3.63 photograph /100 trap days), followed by wild boar and muntjac were (1.33 and 1.27 photographed/100 traps days respectively). Based on Shannon Weiner analysis shows the analysis of species diversity (H), which showed that in the northern and southern areas it was moderate (2.40 and 2.45 respectively). The level of evenness between north and south areas shows high evenness (0.77 and 0.79 respectively). The level of species richness between north and south shows moderate to high levels in the two areas (3.95 and 4.42 respectively). Our findings suggest that Batang Angkola Landscape supports a high species richness. Continued survey efforts need to be combined with detailed ecological data collection and effective management in the region.
Menilai keanekaragaman spesies di kawasan non-konservasi sangat penting untuk memahami upaya pengelolaan dan intervensi konservasi. Kami menggunakan camera trap untuk menyelidiki keanekaragaman spesies di Bentang Alam Batang Angkola di Sumatera Utara. Kajian keanekaragaman jenis di kawasan ini dilakukan selama 5 bulan dari Februari hingga Juni 2020. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji keanekaragaman jenis di bentang alam Batang Angkola sebagai acuan perbaikan tata kelola dan kebijakan, spesifik pada membuktikan keberadaan spesies satwa liar. Data keanekaragaman spesies, kekayaan dan kemerataan yang kami kumpulkan, dianalisis dengan Shannon wiener. Berdasarkan 1.283 foto di 60 stasiun perangkap kamera selama 2.923 hari rekam, kami mengidentifikasi 27 spesies berbeda (24 spesies mamalia darat, 2 spesies burung, dan 1 spesies reptil), termasuk lima jenis yang diklasifikasikan sebagai satwa terancam menurut IUCN. Berdasarkan perhitungan Indeks Kelimpahan Relatif untuk setiap spesies per 100 hari rekam, beruk memiliki RAI tertinggi (3,63 foto / 100 hari rekam), disusul babi hutan dan kijang (masing-masing 1,33 dan 1,27 foto / 100 hari rekam). Berdasarkan analisis Shannon-Weiner untuk keanekaragaman jenis (H) menunjukkan bahwa di wilayah utara dan selatan dalam kategori sedang (masing-masing 2,40 dan 2,45). Tingkat kemerataan antara wilayah utara dan selatan menunjukkan tingkat kategori kemerataan yang tinggi (masing-masing 0,77 dan 0,79). Tingkat kekayaan spesies antara utara dan selatan menunjukkan kategori tingkat sedang hingga tinggi di kedua wilayah tersebut (masing-masing 3,95 dan 4,42). Temuan kami menunjukkan bahwa Bentang Alam Batang Angkola mendukung kekayaan spesies yang tinggi. Upaya survey lanjutan perlu digabungkan dengan pengumpulan data ekologi yang terperinci dan pengelolaan yang efektif di wilayah tersebut.
Keywords
References
Barrios-GarcÃa, M.N. and Ballari, S.A. (2012). Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biol. Invas. 14: 2283-2300
Ballari, S.A. and Barrios-GarcÃa M.N. (2014). A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal. Rev. 44, 124-134.
Caro, T. and ODoherty, G. (1999). On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 13, 805814.
Carbone, C., Christie, S., Conforti, K., Coulson, T., Franklin, N., Ginsberg, J.R., Griffiths,M., Holden, J., Kawanishi, K., Kinnaird, M., Laidlaw, R., Lynam, A., Macdonald, D.W., Martyr, D., McDougal,C., Nath, L., O'Brien, T., Seidensticker, J., Smith, D.J.L., Sunquist, M., Tilson, R., and Shahruddin, W.N.W (2001). The use of photographic rates to estimate densities of tigers and other cryptic mammals. Anim Conserv 4: 75-79 on wildlifeâ€habitat models. Biol Cons 116, 195 203.
Choudhury, A. (2013). The Mammals of North-East India. First ed. Gibbon Books and the Rhino Foundation for nature in NE India, Guwahati, India.
Cuevas, M.F., Novillo, A., Campos, C., Dacar, M.A., and Ojeda, R.A (2010). Food habits and impact of rooting behaviour of the invasive wild boar, Sus scrofa, in a protected area of the Monte Desert, Argentina. J. Arid Environ. 74, 1582-1585.
Fachrul, M. (2012). Metode sampling bioekologi. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.
Guil, F., Agudin, S., El-Khadir, N., Fernandez-Olalla, M., Figueredo, J., Dominguez, F.G., Garzon, P., Gonzalez, G., Munoz-Igualida, J., Oria, J., and Silvestre, F (2010). Factors conditioning the camera-trapping efficiency for the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56(4):633-640.
Gu, W. and Swihart, R.K (2004). Absent or undetected? Effects of nonâ€detection of species occurrence.
Griffiths, M. G. and van Schaik, C.P (1993). Camera trapping a new tool for the study of elusive rain forest animals. Tropical Biodiversity, 1: 131-135.
Hedges, S., Tyson, M.J., Sitompul, A.F., Kinnaird, M.F., Gunaryadi, D., and Aslan (2005). Distribution, status, and conservation needs of Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) in Lampung Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Biological Conservation 124: 3548.
Herrero, J., GarcÃa-Serrano, A., Couto, S., Ortuno, V.M., and GarcÃa-Gonzalez, R (2006). Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. Eur. J. Wildl.
Res. 52, 245-250.
Huda, R., Istiadi, Y., and Priatna, D (2020). Differences of terrestrial mammal species diversity between natural forest and edge forest areas in Batutegi Protected Forest, Lampung, Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Environmental Studies Vol 1(1): 33-39.
Indriyanto (2006). Ekologi Hutan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta
Isnan, M.W., Subrata, D.D., and van Strien, N.J (2006). Annual Report 2006. Bogor, Indonesia: Indonesian Rhino Conservation Program.
Karanth, U. K., and Nichols, J.D (eds.) (2002). Monitoring tigers and their prey: a manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia. Bangalore: Centre for Wildlife Studies.
Karanth, K.U., and Sunquist, M.E. (1995). Prey selection by tiger, leopard and dhole in tropical forests. J. Anim. Ecol. 64: 439-450
Karanth, K.U (1995). Estimating tiger Panthera tigris populations from camera-trap data using capture-recapture models. Biological Conservation, 71: 333-338.
Karanth, K.U., and Nichols, J.D (1998). Estimation of tiger densities in India using photographic captures and recaptures. Ecology, 79: 2852-2862.
Kawanishi, K., Sahak, A.M., and Sunquist, M (1999). Preliminary analysis on abundance of large mammals at Sungai Relau, Taman Negara. Journal of Wildlife and Parks (Malaysia), 17: 62-82.
Kiros, S., Afework, B., Legese, K. (2018). A preliminary study on bird diversity and abundance from Wabe fragmented forests around Gubre subcity and Wolkite town, Southwestern Ethiopia. International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biol; 3(5):333‒340.
Koerth, B. H., and KroU, I.C (2000). Bait type and timing for deer counts using cameras triggered by infrared monitors. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28: 630-635.
Kinnaird, M.F., Sanderson, E.W., O'Brien, T.G., Wibisono, H.T., and Woolmer, G. (2003) Deforestation trends in a tropical landscape and implications for endangered large mammals. Conservation Biology 17: 245257.
Lambeck, R.J (1997). Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv. Biol. 11, 849856.
Larrucea, E.S., Brussard, P.F., Jaeger, M.M., and Barrett, R.H. (2007). Cameras, coyotes, and the assumption of equal detectability. J Wildl Manage 71(5):1682-1689
Linkie, M., Haidir, I.A., Nugroho, A., and Dinata, Y (2008). Conserving tigers Panthera tigris in selectively logged Sumatran forests. Biological Conservation 141:2410 - 2415.
Linkie, M., Martyr, D.J., Holden, J., Yanuar, A., Hartana, A.T., Sugardjito, J., and Williams, N.L. (2003). Habitat destruction and poaching threaten the Sumatran tiger in Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra. Oryx 37: 4148.
Maddox,T., Priatna, D., Gemita, E., and Salampessy, A (2007). The conservation of tigers and other wildlife in oil palm plantations. Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia (October 2007). ZSL Conservation Report No. 7 The Zoological Society of London, London.
McCuUough, D.R., Pei, K.C.I., and Wang, Y. (2000). Home range, activity patterns, and habitat relations of Reeves' muntjacs in Taiwan. Journal of Wildlife Management, 64: 430-441.
Martorello, D. A., Eason, T.H., and Pelton, M.R (2001). A sighting technique using cameras to estimate population size of black bears. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29: 500-567.
Margono, B. A., Turubanova, S., Zhuravieva, S., Potapov, P., Tyukavina, A., Baccini, A., Goetz, S., and Hansen, M.C (2012). Mapping and monitoring deforestation and forest degradation in Sumatra (Indonesia) using Landsat time series data sets 1990 to 2010. Env. Res. Lett. 7: 034010.
Melo, F.P., Arroyo-RodrÃguez, V., Fahrig, L., Martinez-Ramos, M., and Tabarelli, M (2013a). On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 28: 462468.
Newbold,T., Hudson, L.N., and Hill, S.L.L., et al (2015). Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:4550
OBrien T.G, Kinnaird, M.F., and Wibisono, H.T (2003). Crouching tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. Animal Conservation 6: 131-139.
Odum, E.P (1983) Basic Ecology. CBS College Publishing, New York.
Perbatakusuma, E.A., Supriatna, J., Wijayanto, I.H., Soedijito, H., Damanik, A., Azmi, K., Arif, M.C.F., and Lubis, A.H (2010). Strengthening biodiversity Conservation at Key Landscape Areas in Northern Sumatra Biodiversity Corridor. [Project Report]. Conservation International Indonesia.
Santosa Y., Ramadhan, E.P., and Rahman, D.A (2008). Studi keanekaragaman mamalia pada beberapa tipe habitat di Stasiun Penelitian Pondok Ambung Taman Nasional Tanjung Puting Kalimantan Tengah. Media Konservasi 13(3):1-7.
Sanderson, E., Redford, K.H., Vedder,A., Coppolillo, P., and Ward, S (2001). A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements. Landsc. Urban Plann. 58, 4156.
Shafer, C. L (1999). US national park buffer zones: Historical, scientific, social, and legal aspects. Environmental Management 23(1): 49-73.
Shannon C.E.E (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27(3): 379423. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Sodhi, N.S., Koh, L.P., Brook, B.W., and Ng, P.K.L (2004). Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends Ecol Evol 19:654660.
Stibig, H.J., Achard, F., Carboni, S., Raši, R., and Miettinen, J. (2014). Change in tropical forest cover of Southeast Asia from 1990 to 2010. Biogeosciences, 11, 247258. doi:10.5194/bg-11-247-2014.
Sunarto S., Sollmann, R., Mohamed, A., and Kelly, M.J. (2013). Camera trapping for the study and conservation of tropical carnivores. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 28:21-42.
Van Schaik, C. P., and Griffiths, M (1996). Activity periods of Indonesian rain forest mammals. Biotropica, 28: 105-112.
Wibisono, H.T., and Pusparini, W (2010). Sumatran tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae): A review of conservation status. IntegrZool 5: 313-323.
Wang, F., et al (2014). Evaluating Landscape Options for Corridor Restoration between Giant Panda Reserves. PLoS One 9 (8).
Wemmer, C., Kunz, T.H., Lundie-Jenkins, G., and McShea, W.J (1996). Mammalian sign. In: Wilson, D. E., F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran & M. S. Foster (eds.). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Mammals. Pp. 157- 176. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London.
Whitten, T., Damanik, S.J., Anwar, J., and Hisyam, N (2000). The ecology of Sumatra. 2nd edition. Periplus Editions, Singapore.
Wikramanayake, E.D., Dinerstein, E., Loucks, C.J., Olson, D.M., Morrison, J., and Lamoreux, J et al. (2002). Terrestrial Ecoregions of the Indo-Pacific: A Conservation Assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Yanuar A., Chivers, D.J., Sugardjito, J., Martyr, D.J., and Holden, J.H (2009). The Population Distribution of Pig-tailed macaque Macaca nemestrina) and long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) in West Central Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian Primates Journal 1(2):2-11.
DOI: 10.33751/injast.v1i2.2385
Abstract views : 572
views : 354
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Indonesian Journal of Applied Environmental Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
