Strategi Implementasi Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Berdasarkan Evaluasi Komprehensif Di SMP Bina Insani Kota Bogor

Suwarni Suwarni, Hendarman Hendarman, Herfina Herfina

Abstract


STRATEGY FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL LITERACY MOVEMENT PROGRAM BASED ON A COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION AT SMP BINA INSANI KOTA BOGOR

This research aimed to analyze the implementation of the School Literacy Movement (SLM) program at SMP Bina Insani Kota Bogor using evaluative research methods with the CIPPO model which included the components of context, input, process, product and outcomes. The aspects evaluated were those that had gone well and those that were still not optimal as a basis for policy making in the following years. Data collection was carried out through techniques of interview, observation and documentation studies. The informants were determined using purposive sampling. The data analysis technique used the Miles and Huberman model, namely data reduction, data display and conclusions. The results of the research showed that of the 4 aspects in the context component evaluated, each received "Very Good" score category, of the 6 aspects in the input component evaluated, 2 aspects received "Good" score category and 4 aspects received "Very Good" score category, of the 5 aspects in the process component evaluated, 3 aspects received "Good" score category and 2 aspects received "Very Good" score category, 1 aspect evaluated in the product component received "Very Good" score category, and 2 aspects evaluated in the outcomes component, each received "Very Good" score category. Thus, the implementation of the School Literacy Movement (SLM) program at SMP Bina Insani Kota Bogor had generally been conducted very well with an achievement rate of 93.05% and could be continued with 2 aspects in the input component and 3 aspects in the process component were still allowing for improvement.

Keywords


Program Evaluation; School Literacy Movement; CIPPO

References


Ambiyar, & Muharika D. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Evaluasi Program (Kesatu). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Antoro, B. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah: Dari Pucuk Hingga Akar. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2018). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Darodjat & Wahyudhiana. (2015). Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. ISLAMADINA, Volume XIV , No. 1 , Maret 2015 : 1-28

Fazri, Y., Harun, C. Z., & Usman, N. (2021). Principal Management in Implementation of the School Literacy Movement Program. 576(Icstms 2020), 414–418.

Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme for International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018

Hilmi, M. (2022). Evaluation Of CIPP Model Program In Elderly Empowerment. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 11(2), 58–66.

Kantun, S. (2016). Penelitian Evaluatif Sebagai Salah Satu Model Penelitian dalam Bidang Pendidikan (Suatu Kajian Konseptual ). 10.

Mufid, M. (2020). Evaluasi Model Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) Program Baca Tulis Al-Qur’an di Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pekalongan. Quality, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/quality.v8i1.6908

Munthe, A. P. (2015). Pentingya Evaluasi Program Di Institusi Pendidikan: Sebuah Pengantar, Pengertian, Tujuan dan Manfaat. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 5(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2015.v5.i2.p1-14

Nurfaizah, Y., & Tari, S. (2021). Vol. 4, No. 2, Juli 2021 Jurnal Riset Golden Age PAUD UHO. 4(2).

OECD. (2019). What Students Know and Can Do. PISA 2018 Results, I. https://doi.org/10.1787/g222d18af-en

Pantiwati, Y., dkk. (2020). The Characteristics of Literacy Management in School Literacy Movement (SLM) at Junior High School in Malang - Indonesia. Asian Social Science, 16(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v16n4p15

Retnaningdyah, P. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Ramandanu, F. (2019). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (Gls) Melalui Pemanfaatan Sudut Baca Kelas Sebagai Sarana Alternatif Penumbuhan Minat Baca Siswa. Mimbar Ilmu, 24(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v24i1.17405

Redy, P., & Jaya, Partus. Ndeot, F. (2018). Mengevaluasi Program Layanan Paud Holistik Integratif. PERNIK Jurnal PAUD, 1(1), 10–25.

Rusdiana. (2017). Manajemen Evaluasi Program Pendidikan (p. 246). Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Stufflebeam., D. L. G. Z. T. (2017). THE CIPP EVALUATION MODEL How to Evaluate for Improvement and Accountability. New York: A Division of Guilford. Inc.

Sulistyo, A. (2017). Evaluasi Program Budaya Membaca Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2017.v4.i1.p48-58

Sumiyani. (2021). Evaluasi Program Literasi Membaca di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Https://Jurnal.Unibrah.Ac.Id/Index.Php/JIWP, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5797069

Susilawati, Zulfiati, & Dudung, A. (2016). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Berbasis Kompetensi di Unit Pelaksana Teknis Daerah Balai Latihan kerja Karawang (Penerapan Model Evaluasi Cippo). Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Dan Vokasional, 2(1), 38–45.

Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2008). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi Untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Utami, T. (2021). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah dalam Menumbuhkan Minat Baca Peserta Didik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. 217–223.

Vanbela, V. T., Fuad, N., & Marini, A. (2018). Evaluasi Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di SDN Rorotan 05 Kota Jakarta Utara. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 2(2), 1–13.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2019). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Panduan Praktis bagi Pendidik dan Calon pendidik (X). Pustaka Pelajar.

Yati, F., & Yaswinda, Y. (2019). Penerapan Model Evaluasi CIPPO dalam Mengevaluasi Penyelenggaraan Lembaga PAUD. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v4i1.238


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jmp.v12i1.10536

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.