Digital Multimodal Composing (DMC) Using Canva: EFL Students' Perspectives

Syifa Alfathira

Abstract


Kurikulum Merdeka is one of the government's policies to improve the quality of learning by integrating media and technology into learning activities. Making use of technology in Kurikulum Merdeka and multimodal approach can be an appropriate alternative to help students improve the quality of their learning. For example, Digital Multimodal Composing (DMC) task using Canva resulted from combining technology implementation and multimodality. This study aims to analyze EFL students’ perspectives on using Canva to complete Digital Multimodal Composing (DMC) tasks which applied a descriptive qualitative method with questionnaire and interview as instruments. The respondents are fourth semester students of the English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of Teachers Training and Educational Sciences, Pakuan University. The results showed students’ positive perspectives regarding Canva as a very useful for completing DMC tasks and is the right solution because of the ease of use, exciting and useful features and also can develop students' 4Cs abilities and understanding of concepts of multiliteracy, multimodal, and infographics. The combination of Canva and DMC enhances students' learning motivation, produces high-quality infographics, and demonstrating their effective utilization of technology. Additionally, it is recommended that further research analyze this topic with a large scope of respondents and with additional instruments so that the research data obtained can be more varied, as well as exploring other digital tools for completing multimodal tasks. It is hoped that this study can serve as a valuable reference for future studies on the same topic.

References


Ammenwerth, E. (2019). Technology Acceptance Models in Health Informatics: TAM and UTAUT. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 263, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190111

Bouchey, B., Castek, J., & Thygeson, J. (2021). Multimodal Learning. In Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia (Vol. 14, Issue 3), 35. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33445

Chen, H. H., Lee, M. C., Wu, Y. L., Qiu, J. Y., Lin, C. H., Tang, H. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2012). An analysis of Moodle in engineering education: The TAM perspective. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2012, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360324

Choirunisa, A., & Fadly, A. (2023). The Use of Canva Application on Material of Advertising Text. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 56(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v56i2.63543

Collins, C. S., & Stockton, C. M. (2018). The Central Role of Theory in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797475

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. In Sage Publications (Vol. 77, Issue 4, pp. 731–751). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00177

Fauziyah, N. L., Widodo, J. P., & Yappi, S. N. (2022). The use of Canva for education’ and the students’ perceptions of its effectiveness in the writing procedure text. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 5(1), 6368–6377.

Finch, A. (2012). Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6

Harryanto, Muchran, M., & Ahmar, A. S. (2018). Application of TAM model to the use of information technology. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (UAE), 7(2.9 Special Issue 9), 37–40.

Hughes, I. A. (2005). A perspective on perspectives. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90(8), 771. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.073536

Kneeland, E. T., & Kisley, M. A. (2023). Lay perspectives on emotion: past, present, and future research directions. Motivation and Emotion, 47(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10015-4

Masrom, M. (2007). Technology acceptance model and E-learning. 12th International Conference on Education, May, 21–24.

Mugo, D. G., Njagi, K., Chemwei, B., & Motanya, J. O. (2017). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its Application to the Utilization of Mobile Learning Technologies. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science (2017) 20(4) 1-8

Pedroso, J. E., Rv S. Sulleza, Keith Hae Moon C. Francisco, Ayya Jade O. Noman, & Chynna Althea V. Martinez. (2023). Students’ Views on Using the All-In-One Tool for Creativity and Collaboration. Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education, 2(2), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.56778/jdlde.v2i2.117

Pham, Q. N., & Li, M. (2023). Digital Multimodal Composing Using Visme: EFL Students’ Perspectives. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(5), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00687-w

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories An Educational Perspective. In Space Science Reviews (Vol. 71, Issues 1–4). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751323

Silva, P. (2015). Davis’ Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (1989). Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption: Theories and Trends, 1989, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch013

Trisanti, N., Sukyadi, D., & Suherdi, D. (2022). Digital Multimodal Composing Usage in EFL Secondary Classroom A Study of In-Service EFL Teachers ’ Perception. 375–382.

Yucel, A., Gulbahar, U., & Yasemin, Y. (2013). Technology Acceptance Model: A Review of the Prior Predictors. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 46(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1501/egifak_0000001275

Yundayani. (2019). Investigating the effect of Canva on students’ writing skills. ENGLISH REVIEW: Journal of English Education, 7(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v7i2.1800.Received


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55215/jetli.v6i2.10593 Abstract views : 42 views : 26

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics Studies (JET Li)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.