WRITING STYLE COMPARISON BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE STUDENTS IN WRITING ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY

Amalia Salsabila, Atti Herawati, Istiqlaliah Nurul Hidayati

Abstract


Male and female students have different and similar writing styles. These differences and similarities make them have their own characteristics in writing. The differences that occur can be seen in terms of lexical and grammatical features. This research aimed to compare writing style between male and female students in writing argumentative essay. This research was conducted at English Language Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Educational Sciences, Pakuan University. There were four male and four female students from 4A in this research as the participants. To gain the research data, the researcher used three research instruments: documentation, questionnaire, and interview. Documentation instrument was used to analyze students work. Questionnaire instrument was distributed two times for each student. Interview was conducted once for each student. According to the data analysis, it was found that there are two similarities and three differences between male and female students in writing argumentative essay. The similarities are the use of psychological processes and the use of sentence structure, punctuation, and capitalization. The differences are the way to express the opinion, the use of words, and the use of certain possessive pronouns more frequently

References


Ahmad, Zulfiqar. 2019. Analyzing Argumentative Essay as an Academic Genre on Assessment Framework of IELTS and TOEFL. English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98533-6_13

Alami, Maryam Sabbah and Mohammad Iranmanesh. 2013. Male-Female Discourse Difference in Terms of Lexical Density. Maxwell Scientific Organization. ISSN: 2040-7459; e-ISSN:2040-7467.

Crusius, Carolyn Channell. 2003. Aims of Argument: Text and Reader. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2003. ISBN 0072948353, 9780072948356.

Hyland, K. 2003. Second Language Writing, in Responding to Student Writing, ed. Jack C Richards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press as cited in Raihany, Afifah. 2014. The Importance of Teachers Written Feedback on the Students Writing in Teaching Learning Process Vol. 1 Tahun 9, Mei 2014.

Imani, Hadina Habil. 2014. Lexical Features of Academic Writing. Language Academy. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Vol. 1, June 2014.

Ishikawa, Yuka. 2014. Gender differences in Vocabulary Use in Essay Writing by University Students, pp 598. 2nd Global Conference on Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching, LINELT-2014, Dubai United Arab Emirates, December 11 13, 2014.

Mayberry, Katherine. 2009. Everyday Arguments. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 10: 0-618-98675-8 ISBN 13: 978-0-618-98675-0

Morais, Veldeci Santos, et al. 2020. Netnography: Origins, Foundations, Evolution and Axiological and Methodological Developments and Trends. The Qualitative Report.2020. Vol. 25 Number 2

Olson, C.B. 2003. The Reading/Writing strategies for Teaching and Learning in the Secondary Classroom, Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon

Patton MQ. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd Sage Publications; Thousand Oaks, CA:2002.

Steiner, Sara. 2014. Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts, pp 7 13. Osijek.

Wingate, Ursula. 2012. ‘Argument! Helping Students Understand What Essay Writing Is About, pp 145. Kings College London, Department of Education and Professional Studies, Waterloo Rd, London.

White, Fred D. 1986. The writers Art: A Practical Rhetoric & Handbook. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Zare-ee, Sheena Kuar. 2012. Do Male Undergraduate Write More Argumentatively? pp 5788. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55215/jetli.v3i1.3415 Abstract views : 666 views : 307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JETLi | Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics Studies

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.