ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS STEM LITERACY BASED ON GENDER DIFFERENCES IN SCIENCE LEARNING
Abstract
Keywords
References
Ratelle, C.F., Larose, S., Guay, F., & Senécal, C. 2005. Perceptions of parental involvement and support as predictors of college students' persistence in a science curriculum. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 286293.. 19.2.286.
Kennedy, T,J. and Odell, M, R,L. 2014. Engaging Students in STEM Education. Science Education International. 25 (3). 246-258.
Joyce, A. & Dzoga, M.2011. Science, technology, engineering and mathematics education: Overcoming challenges in Europe. Intel Educator Academy EMEA.
Tati, T, Firman, H, and Riandi, R. 2017. The Effect of STEM Learning Through The Project of Designing Boat Model Toward Student STEM Literacy. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education. 2-8. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012157
Gonzalez, H.B. & Kuenzi J. 2012. Congressional Research Service Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education:A Primer, p. 2. Retrieved: http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-cont ent/uploads/2010/05/STEM-Education-Primer.pdf.
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. 2010. Accomplishment in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) and Its Relation to STEM Educational Dose: A 25-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 860-871. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Leon, J, Nunez, J, L., and Liew, J. 2015. Self-determination and STEM Education: Effect of Autonomy, Motivation, and Self-regulated Learning on High School Math Achievement. Learning and Individual Differences. Retrieved: journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lindif.
Moore TJ.; Glancy AW.; Tank, KM, Kersten, JA, Smith KA, and Stohlmann MS. 2014. A framework for quality k-12 engineering education: Research and development. (J-PEER), 4 (2). PDCA12-70 data sheet,†Opto Speed SA, Mezzovico, Switzerland.
Stohlmann, M.; Moore, T. J.; & Roehrig, G. H. 2012. Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2 (1), 4.
Balka, D.2011.Standards of mathematical practice and STEM, Math-science connector newsletter. School Science and Mathematics Association. pp 6-7.
Bybee.2010. What is STEM Education?.Science.329. www.sciencemag.org.
Zolman, A. 2012. Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning. School Science and Mathematics. 112 (1).12-19.
Aninda, A, Permanasari, A, and Ardianto, D. 2019. Implementasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan untuk Meningkatkan Literasi STEM Siswa SMA. Journal of Science Education and Practice. 3 (2). 1-16.
Sookpatdhe T and Soranastaporn S 2016 Simulation and Project Based Learning for Developing Creativity: From Classroom to Real Life TSJLD 1 (1) pp 85 105
Munakata M and Vaidya A 2015 Using Project- and Theme-Based Learning to Encourage Creativity in Science Journal of College Science Teaching 45 (2) pp 48-53.
Ergül N R and Kargın E K 2014 The Effect Of Project-Based Learning On Students Science Success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 136 pp 537 541
Baran, M. & Maskan, A. 2010. The Effect of Project-Based Learning On Pre- Service Physics Teachers Electrostatic Achievements. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences , 5, 243-257
Kılınç, A. 2010. Can Project-Based Learning Close the Gap?. Turkish Student Teachers and Proenvironmental Behaviours. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5, 495-509.
Tseng, et al. 2013. Attitudes Towards Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) in a Project Based Learning (PjBL) Environment. International Journal Technology and Design Education, 23, 87102.
Özer, D., Z., & Özkan, M. 2012. The Effect of the Project Based Learning on the Science Process Skills of the Prospective Teachers of Science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 9 (3), 131-136.
Septiani, A. and Rustaman, N, Y. 2017. Implementation of Performance Assessment in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) Education to Detect Science Process Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012052.
Cook. 2012. Preparing Biology Teachers to Teach Evolution in a Project- Based Approach. Winter, 21 (2).18-30
Hyde, S, J. and Mertz, J, E. 2009. Gender, Culture, and Mathematics Performance. PNAS. 106 (22). 8801-8807.
Konak, S, K., DAllegro, M, L., and Dickinson, S. 2011. Review of Gender Differences in Learning Styles: Suggestion for STEM Education. Contemporary Issues in Education Research. 4 (3). 9-18
Hynes, M., Portsmore, M., Dare, E., Milto, E., Rogers, C., Hammer, D. and Carberry, A. 2011. Infusing Engineering Design into High School STEM Courses. Retrieved from http://ncete.org/flash/pdfs/Infus ing %20Engineering%20Hynes.pdf
Ganley, M , C. and Vasilyeva, M. 2011. Sex Differences in The Relation Between Math Performance, Spatial Skills, and Attitudes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 32. 235-242.
Nurramadhani, A, Utari, S., and Widodo, A. 2013. Gender Differences and Junior High School Students Conceptual mastery by Using Virtual Laboratory Media on Optic Topics. Proceeding of International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education. 11-16.
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S.M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., &Williams, C. C. 2008. Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance. Science, 321, 494495.
DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v4i1.1903
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.