UNILATERAL CHANGE OR REPLACEMENT OF THE PPJB DEED NUMBER BY NOTARY WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE PARTIES (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 35/PID/B/2022/PN.TPG)
Abstract
One of the special powers of a notary is to make a deed in the land sector in the form of making a PPJB deed for parties who have agreed to carry out a land sale and purchase transaction. For some reason, the notary has made changes to the deed number unilaterally without the knowledge of the parties so that his actions have violated the applicable legal procedures. This article raises issues regarding the validity of changing the deed number and the legal implications of the PPJB deed and the notary's responsibility for this action. Based on the results of the study, the notary's actions were a form of error and violated UUJN provisions, which had the implication that the deed had no legal force because it was degraded into an underhand deed and the aggrieved party could claim compensation from the notary. Considering that there is a criminal element, the form of accountability of a notary can be criminally prosecuted and can be temporarily dismissed from 3 to 6 months by the Supervisory Board or the termination can adjust to the length of the criminal court decision.
Keywords
References
Adjie, Habib, I. Made Pria Dharsana dan Muhammad Hafidh (Editor). (2020). Hukum Kenotariatan Indonesia Jilid 1, Bandung: CV. Media Sains Indonesia.
Ali, Zainuddin. (2011). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakana Ke-3. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Djulaka dan Evi Rahayu. (2019). Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Surabaya: Scopindo.
Ilmar, Aminuddin. (2014). Hukum Tata Pemerintahan Edisi Pertama, Cekatan ke-1. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
HR, Ridwan (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.
Kelsen, Hans. (1971). General Theory of Law and State, Russel and Russel, New York. Penerjemah: Raisul Muttaqien, Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara. (2013). Bandung: Nusa Media.
Philipus; M. Hadjon, dkk, (1993). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia (Introduction to the Indonesia administrative Law). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Kosasih. Johannes Ibrohim & Hassanain Haykal, (2021). Kasus Hukum Notaris di Bidang Kredit Perbankan, Cetakan ke-1, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Doly, Denico, (2011). Kewenangan Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta yang Berhubungan Dengan Tanah, Negara Hukum: Vol. 2, No. 2, November, 269-286.
Firdaus, Danial R, Daly Erni, dan Pieter Everhardus Latumenten. (2022). Akibat Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Mengandung Unsur Penyalahgunaan Keadaan Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 77/PDT.G/2020/ PN.SBY. Jurnal Indonesian Notary, Vol. 4. No. 1, 240-264.
Hamonangan, A, Mhd. Taufiqurrahman & Rosma Mediana Pasaribi, (2021). “Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Dalam Transaksi Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dan Atau Bangunan”, Jurnal Rectum, Volume 3, Nomor 2, Juli, 239-255.
Putri, Intan Manisa Aulia. (2020). Akibat Hukum Klausula Pemutusan Secara Sepihak Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (Ppjb) Hak Milik Atas Tanah. Acta Diurnal, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad, Volume 3, Nomor 2, Juni.
Rahmayani, Sri. (2022). Perubahan Minuta Akta Oleh Notaris Secara Sepihak Tanpa Sepengetahuan Penghadap, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, Volume 8 No. 1, April 2020, E-ISSN 2477-815X, P-ISSN 2303-3827. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i1.679
Trisnomurti, Ria., & Suryawan, Gusti Bagus. (2017). Tugas dan Fungsi Majelis Pengawas Daerah Dalam Menyelenggarakan Pengawasan, Pemeriksaan, dan Penjatuhan Sanksi Terhadap Notaris. Notariil, 2, 127–140.
DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v8i1.8067
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
