The Authority Of The House Of Representatives In The Dismissal Of Constitutional Court Judges Based On The Constitution Of The Republic Of Indonesia

Brendah Veldrin Pua, Jeane Neltje Saly

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the authority of the House of Representatives (DPR) regarding the dismissal of Constitutional Court (MK) judges based on the constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This research focuses on the impeachment mechanism, which is the legal basis for removing Constitutional Court judges who have seriously committed violations. The research method used normative legal research with a document analysis approach. The data consists of the constitution, laws, and regulations related to the House of Representatives authority regarding removing Constitutional Court judges. Data were collected from decisions of the Constitutional Court regarding previous cases involving the dismissal of Constitutional Court judges. The analysis showed that the House of Representatives authority in removing Constitutional Court judges is based on Article 24B Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. House of Representatives has an important role in the impeachment process, where the election of Constitutional Court judges requires the approval of the House of Representatives. In addition, the dismissal of Constitutional Court judges can be carried out by 2/3 of the total House of Representatives members. This research provides a better understanding related to the mechanism of the House of Representatives' authority over the removal of Constitutional Court judges, with a focus on the impeachment process. The implication of this research is the importance of maintaining the independence of the Constitutional Court and ensuring that the impeachment process is carried out fairly based on applicable legal provisions concerning democratic principles and the rule of law. This research contributes to the understanding of the House of Representatives authority in monitoring the powers of the constitutional judiciary. It underlines the importance of maintaining the balance of power within the constitutional system of the Republic of Indonesia

Keywords


authority of the house of representatives; dismissal of judges; constitutional court

References


M. Fauzan, “Juridical Problematic On Supervision Of Judges In The Constitutional System Of Republic Of Indonesia,” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2016, Doi: 10.20884/1.Jdh.2016.16.2.615.

N. Huda, D. S. N. Heriyanto, And A. F. G. Wardhana, “The Urgency Of The Constitutional Preview Of Law On The Ratification Of International Treaty By The Constitutional Court In Indonesia,” Heliyon, Vol. 7, No. 9, 2021, Doi: 10.1016/J.Heliyon.2021.E07886.

Rudy, R. Perdana, And R. Wijaya, “The Recognition Of Customary Rights By Indonesian Constitutional Court,” Academic Journal Of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2021, Doi: 10.36941/Ajis-2021-0086.

M. Kovalčík, “The Instrumental Abuse Of Constitutional Courts: How Populists Can Use Constitutional Courts Against The Opposition,” International Journal Of Human Rights, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2022, Doi: 10.1080/13642987.2022.2108017.

W. Reutter, “Subnational Constitutional Courts And Judicialization In Germany,” European Political Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2021, Doi: 10.1057/S41304-020-00293-8.

M. A. Safa’at, “The Roles Of The Indonesian Constitutional Court In Determining State-Religion Relations,” Constitutional Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2022, Doi: 10.31078/Consrev815.

C. Kelliher, S. Isra, Yuliandri, Z. Daulay, H. Tegnan, And F. Amsari, “Unconstitutional Authority Of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court: The Resolution Of Pilkada Result Disputes,” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, And Policy, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2019, Doi: 10.1089/Elj.2018.0535.

L. Karjoko, I. Handayani Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi, A. S. Sudarwanto, D. W. Winarno, A. K. Jaelani, And W. N. Hanum, “The Consequence Of The Decision Of The Constitutional Court In Forestry On The Recognition Of Traditional Forests In Indonesia,” Journal Of Legal, Ethical And Regulatory Issues, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2021.

A. K. Jaelani, I. G. A. K. R. Handayani, And L. Karjoko, “Executability Of The Constitutional Court Decision Regarding Grace Period In The Formulation Of Legislation,” International Journal Of Advanced Science And Technology, Vol. 28, No. 15, 2019.

I. Satriawan And K. A. Mokhtar, “The Role Of Indonesian Constitutional Court In Resolving Disputes Among The State Organs,” Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, Doi: 10.20956/Halrev.V5i2.1669.

B. Kamolane-Kgadima Et Al., “Constitutional Court Statistics For The 2019 Term,” South African Journal On Human Rights, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2021, Doi: 10.1080/02587203.2022.2043401.

Rudy, U. Meylina, And R. Ritonga, “From State Sovereignty To People Sovereignty: A Case Study Of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court,” Journal Of Legal, Ethical And Regulatory Issues, Vol. 24, No. 7, 2021.

M. Fondevila Marón, “A Constitutional Court For The 21st Century: The Challenges Of The Constitutional Jurisdiction In Spain.,” Revista De Derecho Politico, No. 111. 2021. Doi: 10.5944/Rdp.111.2021.31061.

P. Hastuti, “Shifting The Character Of The Constitutional Court Decision Influenced By Political Constellation In Indonesia,” Constitutional Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, Doi: 10.31078/Consrev526.

I. Satriawan And K. A. Mokhtar, “The Role Of Indonesian Constitutional Court In Resolving Disputes Among The State Organs,” Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, Doi: 10.20956/Halrev.V5i2.1669.

I. G. K. Ariawan, “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif,” Kertha Widya, Vol. Vol. 1, No. Nol. 1, 2013.

S. Hardinata, Y. Suchyadi, and D. Wulandari, “Strengthening Technological Literacy In Junior High School Teachers In The Industrial Revolution Era 4.0,” J. Humanit. Soc. Stud., vol. 05, no. 03, pp. 330–335, 2021.

H. Suharyati, H. Laihad, and Y. Suchyadi, “Development of Teacher Creativity Models to Improve Teacher’s Pedagogic Competency in the Educational Era 4.0,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. www.ijicc.net, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 919–929, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.ijicc.net

Y. Suchyadi, Nurjanah, and N. Karmila, Supervisi Pendidikan: Strategi Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru. Bogor: PGSD Universitas Pakuan, 2020.

Suchyadi, Y., & Suryani, A. "Educational Environment In The Implementation Of Character Education". JHSS (Journal Of Humanities And Social Studies), 5(2), 208-212. 2021.

Marwah, H. S., Suchyadi, Y., & Mahajani, T. "Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Subtema Manusia Dan Benda Di Lingkungannya". Journal of Social Studies Arts and Humanities (JSSAH), 1(1), 42-45. 2021.

S. Soekanto, Soerjono; Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, 1st Ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2019.

R. Indonesia, “Uu No. 7 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi,” 2020.

M. A. Muqsith, “Uu Omnibus Law Yang Kontroversial,” ’Adalah, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2020, Doi: 10.15408/Adalah.V4i3.17926.

D. B. Kharisma, “Urgency Of Financial Technology (Fintech) Laws In Indonesia,” International Journal Of Law And Management, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2021, Doi: 10.1108/Ijlma-08-2020-0233.

M. Lutfi And A. Ibrahim Nur, “Reconstruction Of Norm In Selection System Of Constitutional Court Judge Candidates From The Perspective Of The Paradigm Of Prophetic Law,” Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2022, Doi: 10.22219/Ljih.V30i1.20744.

I. Rishan, “Doubting The Impartiality: Constitutional Court Judges And Conflict Of Interest,” Jurnal Jurisprudence, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2022, Doi: 10.23917/Jurisprudence.V12i1.1058.

J. Lamataro, C. W. T., Bire, C. M. D., & Ermalinda, “Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mozaik Kerapuhan,” Jurnal Manajemen, Ekonomi, Hukum, Kewirausahaan, Kesehatan, Pendidikan Dan Informatika (Manekin), Vol. 1, No. 2, 2022.

L. Anjarsari, “Mkmk Berikan Teguran Tertulis Terhadap Hakim Konstitusi M. Guntur Hamzah,” 2023.

F. Fahmiron, “Independensi Dan Akuntabilitas Hakim Dalam Penegakan Hukum Sebagai Wujud Independensi Dan Akuntabilitas Kekuasaan Kehakiman,” Litigasi, Vol. 17, No. 2, P. 3467, 2016, Doi: 10.23969/Litigasi.V17i2.158.

J. Sörensen And E. J. Olsson, “Shadow Management: Neoliberalism And The Erosion Of Democratic Legitimacy Through Ombudsmen With Case Studies From Swedish Higher Education,” Societies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020, Doi: 10.3390/Soc10020030.

J. Sörensen And E. J. Olsson, “Shadow Management: Neoliberalism And The Erosion Of Democratic Legitimacy Through Ombudsmen With Case Studies From Swedish Higher Education,” Societies, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2020, Doi: 10.3390/Soc10020030.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v8i1.8228

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.