1. Home
  2. Vol 7, No 3 (2023)
  3. Novitasari

Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) as a Performance Measurement of Corporate Sustainability

Eni Novitasari, Nurwahyuni Syahrir, Hisyam Ichsan

Abstract


The purpose of this research is to examine the performance assessment technique of corporate sustainability, which is based on measurement using the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) perspective. The SBSC is an evolved performance measurement framework of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC), originally developed by Kaplan and Norton in 1996. This SBSC measurement incorporates four perspectives adopted from the BSC, but further enhanced with environmental performance indicators. The four aspects of the SBSC include the financial perspective, stakeholder perspective, internal process perspective, and learning and growth perspective. For this study, the researchers employed a qualitative descriptive research approach, analyzing the conceptual framework of SBSC developed by Nikolaou in 2013. The research focused on pharmaceutical companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) as the subject of investigation. The research findings revealed that the conceptual framework for sustainability performance assessment developed by Nikolaou can be effectively employed as a reliable and transparent means of evaluating sustainability performance 

Keywords


Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (Sbsc), Performance Measurement Of Corporate Sustainability

References


REFERENCES

Antonsen, Y., 2014. The Downside of The Balanced Scorecard: A Case Study from Norway. Scand. J. Manag. 30 (1), 40–50.

Beusch, P., Frisk, J.E., Rosén, M., Dilla, W., 2022. Management control for sustainability: Towards integrated systems. Manag. Account. Res. 100777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2021.100777

Butler, J.B., Henderson, S.C., Raiborn, C., 2011. Sustainability and the balanced scorecard: Integrating green measures into business reporting. Manag. Account. Q. Winter 12 (2), 1–10.

Chung, C.C., Chao, L.C., Chen, C.H., Lou, S.J., 2016. A balanced scorecard of sustainable management in the Taiwanese bicycle industry: Development of performance indicators and importance analysis. Sustainability 8 (6), 518–538.

Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., Martínez, L., 2022. Collaboration enhanced hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to analyze the renewable energy investment projects. Energy Rep. 8, 377–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.006

Groot, T.L.C.M., Selto, F., 2013. Integrated Financial and Non-financial Measures. In: Groot, T.L.C.M., Selto, F. (Eds.), Advanced Management Accounting. Pearson Education, New York.

Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., Figge, F., 2014. Cognitive Frames in Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Sense Making with Paradoxical and Business Case Frames. Acad. Manag. Rev. 39 (4), 463–487.

Hansen, E.G., Schaltegger, S., 2018. Sustainability balanced scorecards and their architectures: Irrelevant or misunderstood? J. Bus. Ethics 150, 937–952.

Huang, T., Pepper, M., Bowrey, G., 2014. Implementing a sustainability balanced scorecard to contribute to the process of organizational legitimacy assessment. Australas. Account., Bus. Finance J. 8 (2), 15–34.

Jassem, S., Zakaria, Z., Che Azmi, A., 2021. Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Architecture and Environmental Performance Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Productivity Perform. Manag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0582

Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P., 1992. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70, 71–79.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 2022. Kriteria Proper. Diakses pada 27 Juli 2023, dari https://proper.menlhk.go.id/proper/kriteria.

Küçükbay, F., & Sürücü, E. (2019). Corporate Sustainability Performance Measurement Based on A New Multicriteria Sorting Method. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 664–680. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1711

Mio, C., Costantini, A., Panfilo, S., 2021. Performance measurement tools for sustainable business: A systematic literature review on the sustainability balanced scorecard use. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.2206.

Nortjé, C., Middelberg, S.L., Oberholzer, M., Buys, P.W., 2014. Developing a sustainable balanced scorecard for the oil and gas sector. Environ. Econ. 5 (4), 52–60.

Reverte, C., 2012. The impact of better corporate social responsibility disclosure on the cost of equity capital. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 19, 253–272.

Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., 2011. The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: Concept and the Case of Hamburg Airport. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana Universität Lüneburg


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v7i3.8597

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.