Reviewing the Pretrial Judge's Decision in Case Number: 04/Pid.Prap/2015/Pn.Jkt.Sel: As a Legal Discovery or Ambivalent Legal Construction

Sulis Setyowati

Abstract


The decision of the Pretrial Judge who tried Case Number: 04/Pid.Prap/2015/PN.jkt.Sel became controversial because it included the determination of the suspect in the pretrial object and granted the request of the applicant, Komjen Budi Gunawan, with the main argument of making a legal discovery. The legal problem is whether the legal considerations prepared by the pre-trial judge in examining and deciding the case are correct and whether the pre-trial judge in the a quo case did not exceed the limits of authority in the law. This research is normative legal research with a case approach, statutory approach, conceptual approach and philosophical approach. The research data is in the form of secondary data and processed using qualitative descriptive analysis with deductive thinking logic. The results of the research are 1) in the pretrial lawsuit filed by Budi Gunawan, there is no normative formula that can be used by pretrial judges to assess the validity of the suspect's determination. Considering the formulation of the meaning of Article 1 number 10 jo. Article 77 jo. Article 82 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code can be seen that whether the suspect's determination is valid or not is not a pretrial object, because it is not regulated. 2) The ambivalence of the pretrial judge's views can be seen in his considerations regarding the meaning of coercive measures as a concept or legal institution.

Keywords


pretrial decisions; judges; legal discovery; legal construction

References


Adhityo, Y. (2019). Penetapan Sah Tidaknya Status Tersangka Pada Perkara Korupsi Budi Gunawan (Study Normatif Putusan Nomor: 04/Pid.Prap/2015/Pn.Jak.Sel “Praperadilan). Brawijaya Law Student Journal. Retrieved From Http://Hukum.Studentjournal.Ub.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Hukum/Article/View/3173, 3 Nopember 2023.

M. Syamsudin Dan Salman Luthan, Mahir Menulis Studi Kasus Hukum, Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group, 2018.

M. Syamsudin, Konstruksi Baru Budaya Hukum Hakim Berbasis Hukum Progresif, Jakarta, Prenada Media Group, 2012.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Sebagaimana Telah Dirubah Dan Ditambah Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.

S. Setyaningsih and Y. Suchyadi, “Implementation of Principal Academic Supervision To Improve Teacher Performance in North Bogor,” Jhss (Journal Humanit. Soc. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 179–183, 2021, doi: 10.33751/jhss.v5i2.3909.

Y. Suchyadi and Nurjanah, “Relationship between Principal Supervision in Increasing the Job Satisfaction of Private Junior High School Teachers in East Bogor District,” JHSS (Journal Humanit. Soc. Stud., vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 26–29, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v2i1.818.

Y. Suchyadi, “Relationship between Work Motivation and Organizational Culture in Enhancing Professional Attitudes of Pakuan University Lecturers,” JHSS (JOURNAL Humanit. Soc. Stud., vol. 01, no. 01, pp. 41–45, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v1i1.372.

Y. Suchyadi, N. Karmila, and N. Safitri, “Kepuasan Kerja Guru Ditinjau Dari Peran Supervisi Kepala Sekolah Dasar Negeri Di Kecamatan Bogor Utara,” JPPGuseda | J. Pendidik. Pengajaran Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–94, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.33751/jppguseda.v2i2.1453.

R. Purnamasari et al., “Student Center Based Class Management Assistance Through The Implementation Of Digital Learning Models,” J. Community Engagem., vol. 02, no. 02, pp. 41–44, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33751/jce.v2i2.2801.

Y. Suchyadi and H. Suharyati, “The Use Of Multimedia As An Effort To Improve The Understanding Ability Of Basic School Teachers ‘Creative Thinking In The Era ‘Freedom Of Learning,’” in Merdeka Belajar, A. Rahmat, Ed. Yogyakarta: Zahir Publishing, 2021, pp. 42–53.

Y. Suchyadi et al., “Increasing Personality Competence Of Primary School Teachers, Through Education Supervision Activities In Bogor City,” J. COMMUNITY Engagem., vol. 01, no. 01, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/jce

Y. Suchyadi et al., “Improving The Ability Of Elementary School Teachers Through The Development Of Competency Based Assessment Instruments In Teacher Working Group , North Bogor City,” J. COMMUNITY Engagem., vol. 02, no. 01, pp. 1–5, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.33751/jce.v2i01.2742.

S. Hardinata, Y. Suchyadi, and D. Wulandari, “Strengthening Technological Literacy In Junior High School Teachers In The Industrial Revolution Era 4.0,” J. Humanit. Soc. Stud., vol. 05, no. 03, pp. 330–335, 2021.

H. Suharyati, H. Laihad, and Y. Suchyadi, “Development of Teacher Creativity Models to Improve Teacher’s Pedagogic Competency in the Educational Era 4.0,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. www.ijicc.net, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 919–929, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.ijicc.net

Y. Suchyadi, Nurjanah, and N. Karmila, Supervisi Pendidikan: Strategi Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru. Bogor: PGSD Universitas Pakuan, 2020.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v7i3.9329

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.