Sentiment Analysis On The Presidential Threshold Policy In Elections As A Principle Of Democracy Jovi

Jovianus Abel Andreas, Erick Dazki

Abstract


Indonesia is a country that adheres to a presidential system of government. Elections are the basis of a democratic country in its implementation. Democracy is the government of reason by the people, for the people, and of the people, hence the people have the highest position in a democracy. The existence of a threshold is controversial in political dynamics because it is considered as a suppression of democratic values. Sentiment analysis is used to evaluate public assumptions about the application of the threshold by filling out a questionnaire that will be filled by subjects who have attitudes towards politics. Naïve Bayes and SVM are the methods used in solving sentiment analysis classification. Data collected through Twitter crawling is integrated with 1500 data from public assumptions about the presidential threshold. Naïve Bayes and SVM methods will be used to classify comment data. Through testing and classification, 784 comments were obtained which will be used as training data. The accuracy obtained from processing is 75.13% for Naïve Bayes and 83.29% for SVM.

 


Keywords


Presidential Threshold, Naïve Bayes, Laplacian, Sentiment Analysis, SVM

References


A. M. Al Mas’udah, “The Presidential Threshold As An Open Legal Policy In General Elections In Indonesia,” Prophetic Law Review, vol. 2, no. 1, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.20885/plr.vol2.iss1.art3.

A. Fitri and W. Setiadi, “Presidential Threshold dalam Pemilihan Umum Serentak: Kemunduran Demokrasi Konstitusional?,” 2022.

S. D. Ambarwati, M. R. Saifulloh, and S. M. S. Aritonang, “REKONSTRUKSI SISTEM PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DALAM SISTEM PEMILU DI INDONESIA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD INDONESIA DAN BRAZIL),” Bulan Kedelapan, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/

V. Anggara, “Dinamika Presidential Threshold dalam Sistem Presidensial di Indonesia,” 2019.

E. Y. Hidayat, R. W. Hardiansyah, and A. Affandy, “Analisis Sentimen Twitter untuk Menilai Opini Terhadap Perusahaan Publik Menggunakan Algoritma Deep Neural Network,” Jurnal Nasional Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 108–118, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.25077/teknosi.v7i2.2021.108-118.

M. K. Anam, M. I. Mahendra, W. Agustin, R. Rahmaddeni, and N. Nurjayadi, “Framework for Analyzing Netizen Opinions on BPJS Using Sentiment Analysis and Social Network Analysis (SNA),” INTENSIF: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Penerapan Teknologi Sistem Informasi, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–28, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.29407/intensif.v6i1.15870.

E. Y. Hidayat and D. Handayani, “Penerapan 1D-CNN untuk Analisis Sentimen Ulasan Produk Kosmetik Berdasar Female Daily Review,” Jurnal Nasional Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 153–163, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.25077/teknosi.v8i3.2022.153-163.

H. H. Sinaga and S. Agustian, “Pebandingan Metode Decision Tree dan XGBoost untuk Klasifikasi Sentimen Vaksin Covid-19 di Twitter,” Jurnal Nasional Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 107–114, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.25077/teknosi.v8i3.2022.107-114.

M. O. Odim, A. O. Ogunde, B. O. Oguntunde, and S. A. Phillips, “Exploring the performance characteristics of the naïve bayes classifier in the sentiment analysis of an Airline’s social media data,” Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 266–272, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.25046/aj050433.

W. Budiharto and M. Meiliana, “Prediction and analysis of Indonesia Presidential election from Twitter using sentiment analysis,” J Big Data, vol. 5, no. 1, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40537-018-0164-1.

C. Villavicencio, J. J. Macrohon, X. A. Inbaraj, J. H. Jeng, and J. G. Hsieh, “Twitter sentiment analysis towards covid-19 vaccines in the Philippines using naïve bayes,” Information (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 5, May 2021, doi: 10.3390/info12050204.

A. A. Farisi, Y. Sibaroni, and S. Al Faraby, “Sentiment analysis on hotel reviews using Multinomial Naïve Bayes classifier,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Institute of Physics Publishing, May 2019. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1192/1/012024.

M. Z. Nafan and A. E. Amalia, “Kecenderungan Tanggapan Masyarakat terhadap Ekonomi Indonesia berbasis Lexicon Based Sentiment Analysis,” JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 268, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.30865/mib.v3i4.1283N. Ramadhani and N. Fajarianto, “Sistem Informasi Evaluasi Perkuliahan dengan Sentimen Analisis Menggunakan Naïve Bayes dan Smoothing Laplace,” JURNAL SISTEM INFORMASI BISNIS, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 228–234, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.21456/vol10iss2pp228-234.

D. Berrar, “Bayes’ theorem and naive bayes classifier,” in Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology: ABC of Bioinformatics, vol. 1–3, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 403–412. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20473-1.

B. Liu, “Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining,” Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2012.

M. Nababan et al., “The diagnose of oil palm disease using Naive Bayes Method based on Expert System Technology,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Institute of Physics Publishing, Apr. 2018. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1007/1/012015.

S. Samsir, K. Kusmanto, A. H. Dalimunthe, R. Aditiya, and R. Watrianthos, “Implementation Naïve Bayes Classification for Sentiment Analysis on Internet Movie Database,” Building of Informatics, Technology and Science (BITS), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–6, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i1.1468.

Y. Surya, S. Al Faraby, and M. Dwifebri, “Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Ulasan Film Menggunakan Word2Vec dan SVM.”

T. I. Saputra and R. Arianty, “IMPLEMENTASI ALGORITMA K-MEANS CLUSTERING PADA ANALISIS SENTIMEN KELUHAN PENGGUNA INDOSAT,” Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Komputer, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 191–198, 2019, doi: 10.35760/ik.2019.v24i3.2361.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v8i2.9444

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.