THE EFFECT OF DISCRETIONARY AND NON-DISCRETIONARY INCOME SMOOTHING AND CAPITAL BUFFER ON CREDIT GROWTH: MODERATED BY LIQUIDITY RISK
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to examine the effect of discretionary and non-discretionary income smoothing and capital buffers on credit growth, moderated by liquidity risk. This study uses data regression analysis with a fixed-effects model. The study sample consisted of 170 respondents, consisting of 36 banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2020 to 2024. The results of this study show a significant positive effect of discretionary and non-discretionary income smoothing and capital buffers on credit growth. Liquidity risk has no effect on credit growth, and the interaction with discretionary income smoothing has been proven to strengthen this effect, indicating as quasi-moderation. However, when liquidity risk interacts with non-discretionary income smoothing and capital buffers, the interaction is proven not to strengthen the effect, indicating as predictor moderation. Originality this study offers important insights for regulators and practitioners regarding the impact of income smoothing and capital buffers in controlling credit growth during the COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh perataan laba diskresioner, dan non-diskresioner dan modal penyangga terhadap pertumbuhan kredit bank yang dimoderasi oleh risiko likuiditas. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi data dengan fixed effect model. Sampel penelitian ini sebanyak 170 terdiri dari 36 perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2020 hingga 2024. Hasil studi ini membuktikan adanya pengaruh positif signifikan perataan laba diskresioner dan non-diskresioner dan modal penyangga terhadap pertumbuhan kredit. Risiko likuiditas tidak berpengaruh terhadap pertumbuhan kredit, namun setelah diinteraksikan dengan perataan laba diskresioner, terbukti memperkuat, yang disebut sebagai kuasi moderasi. Risiko likuiditas diinteraksikan dengan perataan laba non-diskresioner dan penyangga modal, terbukti tidak memperkuat, yang disebut sebagai moderasi prediktor. Orisinalitas studi ini menawarkan wawasan penting bagi regulator dan praktisi tentang dampak perataan laba dan modal penyangga dalam mengendalikan pertumbuhan kredit masa pandemic covid-19
Keywords
References
Adzis, AA, Anuar, H., Shah Anuar, H., Shahieda, N., & Hishamuddin, M. (2015). Do Income Smoothing, Capital Management, Signaling, and Pro-Cyclicality Exist Through Loan Loss Provisions? Journal of Economics, Finance and Management, 4(2). http://www.ejournalofbusiness.org
Agung, J., Harun, CA, & Deriantino, E. (2021). Macroprudential Policy in Indonesia. 1st ed., Rajawali Pers
Akbar, MI, & Wibowo, MG (2021). The Effectiveness of Macroprudential Policies in Mitigating the Systemic Risk in Indonesia. Airlangga International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance, 4(2), 91–109
Audya, PS, Kunci, K., Makoprudential, K., & Penulis, E. (2023). The Influence of Macroprudential Policy Instruments on Commercial Bank Credit Growth in Indonesia. Parahyangan Economic Development Review (PEDR), 2(2), 92–108
Behncke, S. (2023). Effects of Macroprudential Policies on Bank Lending and Credit Risks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 63(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-022-00378-z
Ben Maatoug, A., Ben Ayed, W., & Ftiti, Z. (2019). Are MENA Banks' Capital Buffers Countercyclical? Evidence from The Islamic and Conventional Banking Systems. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 74, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.04.006
Bouvatier, V., & Lepetit, L. (2013). Effects of Loan Loss Provisions on Growth in Bank Lending: Some International Comparisons. Economie Internationale, 132(4), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2110-7017(13)60059-1
Caporale, G.M., Alessi, M., Di Colli, S., & Lopez, J.S. (2018). Loan Loss Provisions and Macroeconomic Shocks: Some Empirical Evidence for Italian Banks During the Crisis. Finance Research Letters, 25, 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.10.031
Durafe, A., & Jha, A. (2018). Bank Capital Buffer, Bank Credit and Economic Growth: Evidence from India. Afro-Asian J. Finance and Accounting, Vol. 8, Issue 3
Dursun-de Neef, H. Ö., Schandlbauer, A., & Wittig, C. (2023). Countercyclical Capital Buffers and Credit Supply: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106930
Farook, S., Hassan, M. K., & Clinch, G. (2014). Islamic Bank Incentives and Discretionary Loan Loss Provisions. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 28, 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.12.006
Ghozali, I., & Dwi, R. (2017). Multivariate Analysis and Econometrics, Theory, Concepts, and Applications with Eviews 10. Diponegoro University Publishing Agency
Gozali, V., Setiawan, R., Maruli, S., Ariesa, Y., & Meliza, J. (2023). The Influence of Non-Performing Loans, Loan to Deposit Ratio and Interest Rates on the Proportion of Micro, Small and Medium Business Credit (MSMEs) in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics Development Research, 4(2), 568–579
Hessou, H., & Lai, V. S. (2018). Basel III Capital Buffers and Canadian Credit Unions Lending: Impact of The Credit Cycle and The Business Cycle. International Review of Financial Analysis, 57, 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2018.01.009
Ibáñez-Hernández, F.J., Peña-Cerezo, M., & Araujo, A. (2015). Countercyclical Capital Buffers: Credit-to-GDP Ratio Versus Credit Growth. Applied Economics Letters, 22(5), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2014.946174
DOI: 10.34204/jiafe.v11i2.12806
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








