ALOKASI ANGGARAN, INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL, KINERJA KEUANGAN, DAN INDIKATOR KINERJA UTAMA BADAN LAYANAN UMUM

Setyo Budi Hartono, Wahab Zaenuri, Fania Mutiara Savitri, Dessy Noor Farida, Yuyun Ristianawati

Abstract


Abstrak: Penelitian ini ditujukan pada anggaran dalam bentuk intangible asset (sumber daya manusia) dan tangible asset (aset tetap dan persediaan) yang diprediksi dapat mempengaruhi intellectual capital, kinerja keuangan sekarang dan mendatang, serta indikator kinerja utama. Alokasi anggaran sebagai baromater prioritas dalam mengembangkan intellectual capital ditujukan untuk memenuhi performa keuangan bagi indikator kinerja utama organisasi. Populasi yang juga menjadi sampel yaitu unit dan fakultas pada UIN Walisongo Semarang sebanyak 30 unit. Metode pengambilan sampling menggunakan teknik sampel jenuh yang mengambil seluruh populasi. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa laporan tahunan dan laporan pencapaian indikator kinerja utama tahun 2019-2020. Analisis data menggunakan path analysis. Hasil penelitian ini adalah alokasi APBN tahun 2019 UIN Walisongo hanya terfokus pada tangible asset sebesar 82%, sementara 18% dialokasikan untuk intangible asset. Intangible asset tidak berpengaruh secara  terhadap semua hubungan, hanya tangible asset saja yang dapat mempengaruhi intellectual capital secara langsung dan kinerja keuangan sekarang secara tidak langsung. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan perlu dilakukan audit sumber daya manusia sehingga dapat ditetapkan alokasi kebutuhan anggaran bagi intangible asset-nya.

 

Abstract: This research is aimed at the budget in the form of intangible assets (human resources) and fixed assets and inventories that are predicted to affect intellectual capital, current and future financial performance, as well as key performance indicators. Budget allocation as a priority barometer in developing intellectual capital is aimed at meeting financial performance for the organization's main performance indicators. The population that is also a sample is 30 units and architecture at UIN Walisongo Semarang. The sampling method uses a saturated sample technique that takes the entire population. The data used is secondary data in the form of annual reports and performance indicator reports for 2019-2020. Data analysis using path analysis. The results of this study were that the 2019 State Budget allocation of UIN Walisongo only focused on tangible assets by 82%, while 18% was allocated for intangible assets. Intangible assets do not affect all relationships, only tangible assets can directly affect intellectual capital and current financial performance indirectly. Results Based on this research, it is necessary to conduct an audit of human resources so that they can determine the allocation of budget requirements for intangible assets.


Keywords


anggaran; badan layanan umum; indikator kinerja utama; intellectual capital; kinerja keuangan

References


Ahangar, R. G. (2011). The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital And Financial Performance: An Empirical Investigation in An Iranian Company. African Journal of Business Management, 5(1), 8895.

Bontis, N., Janosevic,S & Dzenopoljac, V. (2015). Intellectual capital in Serbias hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 13651384.

Rabaya, A. J. R., Saleh, N. M., & Hamzah, N. (2020). Intellectual Capital Performance and Firm Value: The Effect of MFRS 139. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 14(1), 1 22. https://doi/org/10/21002/seam.v14i1.11851

Deegan, C. (2004). Financial Accounting Theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Dzenopoljac, V., Janosevic, S., & Bontis, N. (2016). Intellectual Capital and Financial Performance in The Serbian ICT Industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 373396. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2015-0068

Edvinsson, L. & M. Malone. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Companys True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower. HarperCollins.

Ittner, C.D. (2008). Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 38(3), 26172.

Kim, K., Watkins, K. E., & Lu, Z. (2017). The impact of a learning organization on performance. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(2), 177193. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejtd-01-2016-0003.

Lin, H. F. (2014). A multi-stage analysis of antecedents and consequences of knowledge management evolution. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(1), 5274 https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-07-2013-0278

Matthews, J. R. (2011). Assesing Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Performance Measures. Library Quarterly, 81(1), 83110.

Ministry of Finance. (2000). Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Statements in Government. Copenhagen.

Murthy, V. & Mouritsen, J. (2011). The performance of intellectual capital. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(5), 622646.

Olson, O., Guthrie, J. & Humphrey, C. (1998). Global Warning Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management. Cappelen Akademisk Forlag Oslo.

Ornek, A. S., & Ayas, S. (2015). The Relationship Between Intellectual Capital, Innovative Work Behavior and Business Performance Reflection. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 13871395.

Pfeffer, J. (2005). Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective managementof people. Academy of Management Executive, 19(4), 95106.

Pulic, A. (1998). Measuring the Performance of Intellectual Capital in Knowledge Economy. The 2nd McMaster Congress on Measuring and Managing Intellectual Capital, Austria.

_______. (1999). Basic information on VAICâ„¢. Vaicon International, LLC. www.vaicon.net.

_______. (2000). VAICTM an accounting tool for IC managementâ€. International Journal of Technology Management (IJTM), 20.

Madyan, M., & Fikir, R. H. (2019). Intellectual Capital, Financial Performance, and Value of Company. Journal of Adv Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 11(05).

Ulum, I. (2013). Model Pengukuran Kinerja Intellectual CapitalDengan IB-VAIC Di Perbankan Syariah. INFERENSI, 7(1), 185206.

Wyatt, A. (2008). What financial and non-fı´nancial information on intangibles is value-relevant? A review of the evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 38(3), 21756.

Zulbahridar & Ilham, E. (2014). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan dan Non Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Kampar. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Riau, 1(2), 115.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.34204/jiafe.v7i1.2915

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.