1. Home
  2. Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
  3. Hidayat

Digital Leadership of School Principals in Indonesia: Strategic Interventions Needed

Rais Hidayat, Yuyun Elizabeth Patras

Abstract


This study aims to explore the digital leadership of school principals in terms of measurement and leadership characteristics that are difficult to realize in schools. The research method uses a mixed research approach: quantitative followed by qualitative. Quantitative data was obtained through instruments filled in by teachers with a total of 623 respondents in Indonesia. The instrument before deployment has been confirmed to meet the test of readability and validity of the content. Quantitative data analysis using the Rasch Model. Qualitative data were obtained through in-depth interviews with ten respondents to deepen the essential findings of quantitative data. The results of this study show that the research instrument has been able to measure precisely and reliably the digital leadership of school principals. Three characteristics of digital leadership are challenges to be realized: digital competitive intelligence, digital communication, and digital resilience. Strategic interventions such as those proposed in this study are needed to improve the digital leadership of school principals.

Keywords


Digital communication; Digital competitive intelligence; Digital leadership

References


Agustina, R. et al. (2020) ‘Influence of the principal’s digital leadership on the reflective practices of vocational teachers mediated by trust, self efficacy, and work engagement’, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(11), pp. 24–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.11.2.

AlAjmi, M.K. (2022) ‘The impact of digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait’, International Journal of Educational Research, 112(October 2021), p. 101928. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101928.

Antonopoulou, H. et al. (2021) ‘Asociaciones entre liderazgo tradicional y digital en Ambiente académico: durante la pandemia COVID-19’, Artículo De Acceso Abierto, 5(4), pp. 405–428.

Arham, Ahmad Fadhly et al. (2023) Digital Leadership in Education: A Meta-analysis Review, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26956-1_79.

Arnold, J.C. et al. (2018) ‘Assessment of competencies in scientific inquiry through the application of rasch measurement techniques’, Education Sciences, 8(4), pp. 1–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040184.

B, M.R.R. et al. (2023) Digital Leadership in the Scope of Education, Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Management and Technology (ICEMT 2022). Edited by B.B. Wiyono et al. Paris: Atlantis Press SARL. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-95-4.

Baglama, B. et al. (2022) ‘Analysis of Digital Leadership in School Management and Accessibility of Animation-Designed Game-Based Learning for Sustainability of Education for Children with Special Needs’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(13). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137730.

Boone, W.J. (2020) ‘Rasch Basics fot the Novice’, in M.S. Khine (ed.) Rasch measurement: Applications in quantitative educational research. Nature Singapore: Spirnger, pp. 1–281. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1800-3.

Brodovskaya, E. V., Dombrovskaya, A.Y. and Lukushin, V.A. (2022) ‘Management of Digital Communications with Target Groups by Leading Russian Universities’, Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, 31(10), pp. 9–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-10-9-24.

Bui, T.L.T., Kazarenkov, V.I. and de Tran, V. (2020) ‘Application of rasch model to develop a questionnaire for evaluating the quality of teaching for students’ creativity development’, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), pp. 278–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.8.15.

Cavallo, A. et al. (2021) ‘Competitive intelligence and strategy formulation: connecting the dots’, Competitiveness Review, 31(2), pp. 250–275. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2020-0009.

Chong, J., Mokshein, S.E. and Mustapha, R. (2022) ‘Applying the Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM) to investigate the rating scales function in survey research instrument’, Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 41(1), pp. 97–111. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i1.39130.

Comai, S. et al. (2021) ‘Digital Communication Technologies To Support End-Users Learning for a Safe Return To School During Covid-19’, Proceedings of the European Conference on Computing in Construction, pp. 67–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35490/EC3.2021.189.

Connell, J. et al. (2018) ‘The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL)’, Quality of Life Research, 27(7), pp. 1893–1902. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y.

Creswell, J.W. (2012) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson.

Desmaryani, S. et al. (2022) ‘The role of digital leadership, system of information, and service quality on e-learning satisfaction’, International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(4), pp. 1215–1222. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.6.012.

Digna, D. and Widyasari, C. (2023) ‘Teachers’ Perceptions of Differentiated Learning in Merdeka Curriculum in Elementary Schools’, International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), pp. 255–262. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.54770.

Ehlers, U.D. (2020) ‘Digital Leadership in Higher Education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Leadership Studies, 1(3), pp. 6–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.29252/johepal.1.3.6.

Emerson, R.W. (2017) ‘Likert Scales’, Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 111(5), pp. 488–488. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x1711100511.

Engelhard Jr., G. (2020) Invariant Measurement, Invariant Measurement. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073636-11.

Erdreich, L. (2021) ‘Managing parent capital: Parent-teacher digital communication among early childhood educators’, Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 13(1), pp. 135–159. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2021-1-6.

Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H.H. and Aydin, E. (2022) ‘From conventional to digital leadership: exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior’, Management Research Review, 45(11), pp. 1524–1543. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338.

Espina-Romero, L. et al. (2023) ‘Digital Leadership in an Ever-Changing World: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Challenges’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713129.

Etikan, I. (2016) ‘Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling’, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), p. 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.

Ghamrawi, N. and M. Tamim, R. (2023) ‘A typology for digital leadership in higher education: the case of a large-scale mobile technology initiative (using tablets)’, Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), pp. 7089–7110. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11483-w.

Håkansson Lindqvist, M. and Pettersson, F. (2019) ‘Digitalization and school leadership: on the complexity of leading for digitalization in school’, International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(3), pp. 218–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-11-2018-0126.

Hammond, S.P. et al. (2023) ‘A discursive psychological examination of educators’ experiences of children with disabilities accessing the Internet: a role for digital resilience’, Information Communication and Society, pp. 1–21. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2185103.

Hammond, S.P., Polizzi, G. and Bartholomew, K.J. (2023) ‘Using a socio-ecological framework to understand how 8–12-year-olds build and show digital resilience: A multi-perspective and multimethod qualitative study’, Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), pp. 3681–3709. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11240-z.

Ilfiandra et al. (2021) ‘Analysis of the Reliability and Validity of the Peaceful Classroom Questionnaire Using Rasch Model’, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5), pp. 4223–4236. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.05.304.

Jagadisen, M.S. et al. (2022) ‘Digital leadership and organizational capabilities in manufacturing industry: A study in Malaysian context’, Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 10(1), pp. 195–211. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10i1.2237.

Johari, S., Noordin, W.N.W. and Mahamad, T.E.T. (2022) ‘WhatsApp Conversations and Relationships: A Focus on Digital Communication Between Parent-Teacher Engagement in a Secondary School in Putrajaya’, Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(2), pp. 280–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3802-17.

Joshi, A. et al. (2015) ‘Likert Scale: Explored and Explained’, British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), pp. 396–403. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975.

Karakose, T. et al. (2023) ‘A Conversation with ChatGPT about Digital Leadership and Technology Integration: Comparative Analysis Based on Human–AI Collaboration’, Administrative Sciences, 13(7). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13070157.

Karakose, T., Polat, H. and Papadakis, S. (2021) ‘Examining Teachers’ Perspectives on School Principals’ Digital Leadership Roles and Technology Capabilities during the COVID-19 Pandemic’, Sustainability, 13(23), p. 13448. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313448.

Khaldi, K. (2017) ‘Quantitative, Qualitative or Mixed Research: Which Research Paradigm to Use?’, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), pp. 15–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n2p15.

Lu, Z., Vincent, J.I. and MacDermid, J.C. (2021) ‘Evaluation of the Structural Validity of the Work Instability Scale Using the Rasch Model’, Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation, 3(1), p. 100103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100103.

Mehedintu, A. and Soava, G. (2022) ‘A Structural Framework for Assessing the Digital Resilience of Enterprises in the Context of the Technological Revolution 4.0’, Electronics (Switzerland), 11(15). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11152439.

Mohd Noh, M.F. Bin and Mohd Matore, M.E.E. Bin (2020) ‘Rating performance among raters of different experience through multi-facet rasch measurement (MFRM) model’, Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(2), pp. 147–162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.662964.

Mollah, M.A. et al. (2023) ‘Exploring a Pathway to Sustainable Organizational Performance of South Korea in the Digital Age: The Effect of Digital Leadership on IT Capabilities and Organizational Learning’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(10). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107875.

Moon, E.C. (2018) ‘Teaching students out of harm’s way : Mitigating digital knowledge gaps and digital risk created by 1:1 device programs in K-12 education in the USA’, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 16(3), pp. 290–302. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-02-2018-0012.

Munsamy, M., Dhanpat, N. and Barkhuizen, E.N. (2023) ‘The development and validation of a digital leadership competency scale’, Acta Commercii, 23(1), pp. 1–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v23i1.1057.

N., Abdul Musid et al. (2023) ‘Leading Digital Leadership in Schools: Future Implications towards Nation Based on The Quadruple Helix Model’, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(1), pp. 1958–1969. Available at: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i1/16570.

Navaridas-Nalda, F. et al. (2020a) ‘The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools’, Computers in Human Behavior, 112(December 2019). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481.

Navaridas-Nalda, F. et al. (2020b) ‘The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools’, Computers in Human Behavior, 112, p. 106481. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481.

Othman, N. et al. (2014) ‘Assessing Construct Validity and Reliability of Competitiveness Scale Using Rasch Model Approach’, The 2014 WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings, pp. 113–120.

Palilingan, V.R. and Batmetan, J.R. (2019) ‘Competitive Intelligence framework for Increasing Competitiveness Vocational High School Management’, International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 299(Ictvet 2018), pp. 230–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/ictvet-18.2019.52.

Palviainen, Å. and Räisä, T. (2023) ‘Digital communication as part of family language policy: the interplay of multimodality and language status in a Finnish context’, Language Policy, 22(4), pp. 433–455. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-023-09666-3.

Pascoe Leahy, C. (2021) ‘The afterlife of interviews: explicit ethics and subtle ethics in sensitive or distressing qualitative research’, Qualitative Research [Preprint], (2013). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941211012924.

Pieri, M. et al. (2022) ‘Mind-body and creative arts therapies for people with aphasia: a mixed-method systematic review’, Aphasiology, 00(00), pp. 1–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2022.2031862.

Prasetya, A.B., Purnama, D.S. and Prasetyo, F.W. (2020) ‘Validity and Reliability of The Perceived Stress Scale with RASCH Model’, PSIKOPEDAGOGIA Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(2), pp. 2–5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v8i2.17903.

Purnama, S. et al. (2021) ‘Does digital literacy influence students’ online risk? Evidence from Covid-19’, Heliyon, 7(6), p. e07406. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07406.

Riswandi et al. (2020) ‘Implementation of learning organizations to achieve effective schools in the efforts to develop an elementary school education management model’, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), pp. 3034–3040. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080732.

Santoso, H., Abdinagoro, S.B. and Arief, M. (2019) ‘The role of digital literacy in supporting performance through innovative work behavior: The case of indonesia’s telecommunications industry’, International Journal of Technology, 10(8), pp. 1558–1566. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v10i8.3432.

Saputra, N. et al. (2021) ‘Digital Skill During Covid-19: Effects of Digital Leadership and Digital Collaboration’, Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 19(2), pp. 272–281. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2021.019.02.04.

Savotina, N.A. et al. (2020) ‘Digital technology in modern education: Risks and resources’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1691(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012095.

Setiansah, M. et al. (2023) ‘Improving Indonesian seniors’ digital resilience and quality of life through the Digital Academy for Seniors program’, Journal of Media Literacy Education, 15(2), pp. 71–83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2023-15-2-6.

Smykova, M. V. (2020) ‘High school project “I am Ecomanifest” in the system of digital communications’, RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 25(1), pp. 198–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2020-25-1-198-200.

Soriano-Asensi, A. et al. (2021) ‘Active learning in digital communications with low-cost software defined radio’, International Conference on Higher Education Advances, pp. 447–455. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd21.2021.12879.

Sumintono, B. (2018) ‘Rasch Model Measurements as Tools in Assesment for Learning’, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 173(Icei 2017), pp. 38–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.11.

Sun, H. et al. (2022) ‘Digital Resilience Among Individuals in School Education Settings: A Concept Analysis Based on a Scoping Review’, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13(March), pp. 1–13. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.858515.

Sunu, I.G.K.A. (2022) ‘The Impact of Digital Leadership on Teachers’ Acceptance and Use of Digital Technologies’, Mimbar Ilmu, 27(2), pp. 311–320. Available at: https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v27i2.52832.

Supriyanto, A. et al. (2020) ‘Leader’s Strategy on Establishing Organization’s Academic Quality Culture’, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and Technology, 501(Icet), pp. 65–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201204.009.

Svendsen, E.J. et al. (2023) ‘Ad hoc digital communication and assessment during clinical placements in nursing education; a qualitative research study of students’, clinical instructors’, and teachers’ experiences’, PLoS ONE, 18(7 July), pp. 1–14. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287438.

Tanucan, J.C.M., Negrido, C. V. and Malaga, G.N. (2022) ‘Digital Leadership of School Heads and Job Satisfaction of Teachers in the Philippines during the Pandemic’, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.1.

Tigre, F.B., Curado, C. and Henriques, P.L. (2023) ‘Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis’, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 30(1), pp. 40–70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518221123132.

Tilibașa, M.A. et al. (2023) ‘Implications of digital risks on teachers’ motivation and intention to use digital tools: a PLS-POS perspective in Romanian preuniversity education system’, Kybernetes, 52(13), pp. 45–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-06-2023-1116.

Tongco, M.D.C. (2007) ‘Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection’, Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, pp. 147–158. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17348/era.5.0.147-158.

Triono, D., Sarno, R. and Sungkono, K.R. (2020) ‘Item Analysis for examination test in the postgraduate student’s selection with classical test theory and rasch measurement model’, Proceedings - 2020 International Seminar on Application for Technology of Information and Communication: IT Challenges for Sustainability, Scalability, and Security in the Age of Digital Disruption, iSemantic 2020, pp. 523–529. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/iSemantic50169.2020.9234204.

Umah, E.C. et al. (2023) ‘Madrasah Principal Digital Leadership Innovation in Digital Learning Transformation’, Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 17(3), pp. 1–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n3-025.

Villalonga-Olives, E., Kawachi, I. and Rodríguez, A.M. (2021) ‘Rasch model of the bridging social capital questionnaire’, SSM - Population Health, 14, p. 100791. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100791.

Voak, A. et al. (2023) ‘Kampus Merdeka: Providing Meaningful Engagement in a Disruptive World’, Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(8), pp. 223–234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i8.6076.

Wasono, L.W. and Furinto, A. (2018) ‘The effect of digital leadership and innovation management for incumbent telecommunication company in the digital disruptive era’, International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2), pp. 125–130. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13142.

Widyaputri, P. and Sary, F.P. (2022) ‘Digital Leadership and Organizational Communication Toward Millennial Employees in a Telecommunication Company’, Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 6(4), pp. 157–167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i4p15.

Wulandari, W., Murwaningsih, T. and Marmoah, S. (2020) ‘Implementation of merdeka belajar in online learning methods at the school for children of Indonesia’, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452273.

Yeop Johari, A.M. et al. (2023) ‘Challenges of school leaders’ digital leadership: An initial study in Bintulu, Sarawak, Malaysia’, Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 11(1), pp. 57–65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21831/jamp.v11i1.58443.

Yusof, M.R. et al. (2020) ‘Digital communication: Priorities in the relationship of principal leadership and collaborative community at Malaysian School’, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), pp. 1149–1154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080404.

Yusuf, M. et al. (2023) ‘Exploring the role of digital leadership and digital transformation on the performance of the public sector organizations’, International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4), pp. 1983–1990. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.6.014.

Zehirlioglu, L. and Mert, H. (2020) ‘Validity and reliability of the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ): a Rasch measurement model approach’, Primary Care Diabetes, 14(2), pp. 154–160. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2019.06.006.

Zeike, S. et al. (2019) ‘Digital leadership skills and associations with psychological well-being’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), pp. 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142628.

Zeng, X., Li, S. and Yousaf, Z. (2022) ‘Artificial Intelligence Adoption and Digital Innovation: How Does Digital Resilience Act as a Mediator and Training Protocols as a Moderator?’, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148286.

Zhong, L. (2017) ‘Indicators of Digital Leadership in the Context of K-12 Education’, Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 10(1), pp. 27–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1001.03.

Van Zile-Tamsen, C. (2017) ‘Using Rasch Analysis to Inform Rating Scale Development’, Research in Higher Education, 58(8), pp. 922–933. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9448-0.

Zulu, S.L. and Khosrowshahi, F. (2021) ‘A taxonomy of digital leadership in the construction industry’, Construction Management and Economics, 39(7), pp. 565–578. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1930080.

Zupancic, T. et al. (2017) ‘Competences for Digital Leadership in Architecture’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, 1, pp. 289–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2017.1.289.

Zupancic, T. et al. (2018) ‘A Research Framework of Digital Leadership’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, 1(1964), pp. 641–646. Available at: https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2018.1.641.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55215/pedagogia.v16i1.10209 Abstract views : 163 views : 80

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Yuyun Elizabeth Patras

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.