Teachers and Students Perceptions of Grammar Teaching in Curriculum 13

Rahma Sakina

Abstract


This research is aimed at investigating teachers’ and students’ perceptions on the role of grammar in English teaching learning and how grammar is taught in curriculum 13. The research employed a qualitative descriptive design. The data were gathered through questionnaire and interview. The participants involved in this research were three English teachers and thirty students of grade X and XI in a private senior high school in Bandung. The findings revealed that the teachers and students had the same view about the importance of grammar both in language teaching learning and communication. Although the majority of them agreed that the knowledge of grammar is beneficial in both speaking and writing activities, there were a few of them who disagreed its importance in speaking. Furthermore, teachers and students in this research were aware that grammar in the curriculum 13 is more appropriate to be taught under Communicative Language Teaching (in which grammar is taught integrated into communicative activities, inductively, and with contextualized grammar practice) than under Grammar Translation Method (in which grammar is taught in separate lesson, in deductive approach, and emphasizing practice of patterns). From the findings, it was recommended that grammar needs to be taught in the current curriculum using Communicative Language Teaching method.

Keywords


curriculum 13; grammar teaching; students perception; teachers perception.

References


Alwasilah, C. 2009. Pokoknya Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Azar, B. 2007. Grammar-based teaching: a practitioner's perspective. TESL EJ: Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 11 (22), 25-27

Balim, A. G. 2009. The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students’ Success and Inquiry Learnimg Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 35, 5-7.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357–386.

Cadierno, T. (1995). Formal instruction from a processing perspective: An investigation into the Spanish past tense. Modern Language Journal, 79, 179–193.

Cakir, I., & Kafa, S. 2013. English Language Teachers’ Preferences in Presenting Target Language Grammar. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 8, 39-51.

Dewi, M. S. N., Sakina, R., Kulsum, E. M., Uyun, A. S., & Arifin, R. A. (2023). Scaffolding provided by a teacher in teaching writing news item texts. English Review: Journal of English Education, 11(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.6563

Doughty, C. (2001). “Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form”, in P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 206-257.

Ellis, R. 2006. Current Issues in the Teaching of Grammar: An SLA Perspective. TESOL QUARTERLI, 40 (1), 83-87.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007a. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.

Indriani, N. S., & Sakina, R. (2022). Teaching English speaking using role-play technique at a senior high school in Bandung. ELT in Focus, 5(2), 55-66. doi: 10.35706/eltinfc.v5i2.7530

Kao, C. C. 2000. The Role of Grammar in College EFL.94, 255

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2013. Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud

Krashen, S. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford : Pergarnon Press.

Larsen-Free man, D. 1991. Teaching Grammar. In Celce-Murcia 1991

Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T., & Voegtle, K. H. 2006. Methods in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.

Long, M. H. 1983. Does Second Language Instruction Make A Difference? A Review of Research. [Doctoral Thesis, University of Hawaii at Manoa] https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/57fbeb5f-58e6-4e5e-8ab2-9fda5f9278ea/content

Male, H. 2011. Students’ View on Grammar Teaching. Journal of English Teaching. 1 (1), 57-60.

Mekhlafi, A.M & Nagaratnam, R.P. 2011. Difficulties in teaching and learning grammar in an EFL context. International Journal of Instruction: Journal of Difficulties of teaching grammar, 4 (2), 69

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: A sourcebook of a new method (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Norris, J. & Ortega, L. 2000. Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417– 428.

Ortega, L. (2000). “El desarrollo de la competencia gramatical oral en una segunda lengua a través de la actuación lingüística: aproximaciones nteraccionistas y cognitivas”, in C. Muñoz (ed.) Segundas Lenguas. Barcelona: Ariel, 197-229.

Patricia, P. C. & Farell, F. C. 2005. Conceptions of Grammar Teaching: A Case Study of Teachers’ Beliefs and Classroom Practices. TESL-EJ. 9 (5), 1

Richard, J. 2006. Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Schmidt, R. 2001. “Attention”, in P. Robinson (ed.) Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-32.

Thornbury, S. 1999. How to Teach Grammar. London: Longman

Wong, C. C. Y & Marlys, M. B. 2012. The role of grammar in communicative language teaching: an exploration of second language teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9 (1), 61

Wu, H. L. & Volker, D. 2009. The Use of Theory in Qualitative Approaches to Research: Application in End-of-Life Studies. A Journal of Advance Nursing, 65, 2719.

Zhou, K. 2008. An inductive approach to English grammar teaching. HKBU Papers in Applied Language Studies. 12, 7


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55215/pedagonal.v7i1.7305 Abstract views : 142 views : 100

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Rahma Sakina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.