1. Home
  2. Vol 6, No 2 (2023)
  3. Fitriani

THE EFFECT OF LEARNING MODELS (TPS, TPSq, CONVENSIONAL) AND STUDENTS' TAHSIN ABILITY ON PAI LEARNING OUTCOMES

Fitriani Fitriani, Ahsanur Rifqi, Muflihah Muflihah, Rahayu Kariadinata, Adam Malik

Abstract


The cooperative learning model can be supported in the PAI learning process. This study analyzed the effect of learning models (TPS, TPSq, and Conventional) and students' abilities on Islamic education learning outcomes. This research method uses a quantitative type, with the Nonequivalent Posttest_Only Control Group design, with statistical test analysis using Two Way Anova. The results of the analysis of this study indicate that there are differences in learning models (TPS, TPSq, and Conventional) and students' Tahsin abilities in PAI learning outcomes; it can be seen from the output rank that the TPS learning model is 17.65 less than the mean rank of students in the class model. Learning TPSq is 31.35 (17.65 < 31.35). The mean rank value of students in the TPSq learning model class is 32.35, more significant than that of students in the conventional learning model class, which is 16.65 (32.35 > 16.65). The mean rank value of students in the TPS learning model class is 26.96, more significant than that of students in the Conv learning model class, which is 22.04 (26.96 > 22.04). There are differences in Islamic education learning outcomes for class VII A and B students based on Tahsin’s ability; based on the Statistical Test results, the Sig.2-tailed is 0.000, which is more minor (<) than 0.05. There are differences in the learning outcomes of students in classes VII B and C based on Tahsin’s abilities; based on the results of the Test Statistics, the value of Sig.2-tailed is 0.006, this value is more minor (< ) than 0.05, and there are differences in the learning outcomes of students in class VII A and C. based on Tahsin ability, based on the results of the Statistical Test the value of Sig.2-tailed is 0.000 this value is more minor (<) than 0.05.

Keywords


Conventional; Islamic Religious Education; Tahsin; Think Pair Share; Think Pair Square

References


N. Nasiri, “Urgensi Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Globalisasi,” J. Keislam., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 54–71, 2020.

S. Hidayatulloh, “Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Script dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Siswa Kelas X SMA Riyadul Jannah, Ciseeng, Bogor,” Inspiratif Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 188–198, 2021.

T. Noor, “Rumusan Tujuan Pendidikan Nasional Sasal 3 Undang-undang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional No 20 Tahun 2003,” Wahana Karya Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 1, 2018.

A. Saifudin, N. Nafisatuzzahro, L. Lestariningsih, N. Hatyuni, and U. Nahdiyah, “Pendampingan Penggunaan Metode Usmani dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Al-Quran dengan Melalui Halaqoh Mu’alimil Qur’an (HMQ) di TPQ Tarbiyatul Athfal Sumberasri,” Maslahat J. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2022.

H. Sugilar, U. Dedih, C. Anwar, and W. Darmalaksana, “Analisis Kemampuan Tahsin dan Tahfizh Mahasiswa Matematika, Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (MIPA) dan Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI),” Atthulab Islam. Relig. Teach. Learn. J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.15575/ath.v5i1.7244.

F. Arianto, “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) terhadap Prestasi Belajar Pendidikan Agama Islam,” GUAU J. Pendidik. Profesi Guru Agama Islam, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 193–206, 2022.

S. Sulaiman, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Learning Tipe Think Pair-Share untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik Bidang Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) Kelas V SDN 001 Pasir Kelampaian, Kec. Sungai Lala, Kab. Indragiri Hulu,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1153–1160, 2023.

I. N. Asdiwinata, A. I. D. H. Yundari, and N. L. G. I. Saraswati, “Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Keperawatan Kritis Menggunakan Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Square (TPS),” Bali Med. J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 64–71, 2021.

V. R. Kamil, D. Arief, Y. Miaz, and R. Rifma, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar SIsq Kelas VI,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 6025–6033, 2021.

C. V. Sumarsya and S. Ahmad, “Think Pair Share sebagai Model untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1374–1387, 2020.

M. S. Antika, L. Andriani, and R. Revita, “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Square terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika Siswa SMP,” Juring J. Res. Math. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–129, 2019.

S. Subedi, J. A. Dahlan, and S. P. Dewanto, “Dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Self Concept Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dengan Model Pembelajaran Kemp Berbasis Think Pair Square,” Sigma Didakt. J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–106, 2015.

M. D. Wanti, S. Wati, M. Kamal, and A. Afrinaldi, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Learning Tipe Jigsaw oleh Guru PAI di SMK Negeri 1 Koto Baru Dharmasraya,” JUBPI J. Bintang Pendidik. Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 158–171, 2023.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.55215/jppguseda.v6i2.8288 Abstract views : 189 views : 58

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.