ANALYSIS OF RADEC LEARNING MODEL ON TRIBAL AND HEALTH CONCEPTS ON SCIENCE LITERACY
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the radec learning model for scientific literacy and learning outcomes. The type of research used in this study is Quantitative research (quasi experiment). The subjects used in this study were students of class V with a total of 70 students consisting of two classes (VA and VB). The instruments used in this study were in the form of instruments, namely tests, questionnaires, observation and documentation. Data analysis techniques were carried out, namely descriptive tests (mean, median, mode and standard deviation) and inferential tests (Normality, Homogeneity and Manova).. Based on data analysis using SPSS 25 that tests the normality of cyan literacy and learning outcomes usingKolmogorov-Smirnovi.e. sig > 0.05 from the pretest and posttest results of the control and experimental classes and the homogeneity test using the based mean is sig > 0.05 from the pretest and posttest results of the control and experimental classes while the manova test is obtained showing a significance value of 0.000. 0.000 < 0.05 then Ho rejected and Ha accepted. Based on this, it can be concluded that there is a significant influence on the use of the Learning ModelRadec on scientific literacy and science learning outcomes UPT SPF SDI Bontoa Makassar.
Keywords
References
M. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, Defining Twenty-First Century Skill. London: Springer, 2012.
Y. Nugrahini, “Multi-literacy Learning Model,” J. English Lang. Teach. Learn. Lit., vol. 3, no. 1, hal. 66–82, 2020.
I. Salmia, Rosleny, “Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Menuju Pembelajaran Abad 21,” Indones. J. Prim. Educ., vol. Vol. 4, No, no. ISSN: 2597-4866, hal. 1–10, 2020.
R. A. Metila, L. A. S. Pradilla, dan A. B. Williams, “The Challenge of Implementing Mother Tongue Education in Linguistically Diverse Contexts: The Case of the Philippines,” Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 5–6, hal. 781–789, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40299-016-0310-5.
C. Martínez dan T. Olsson, “The warm expert—A warm teacher? Learning about digital media in intergenerational interaction,” Convergence, 2022, doi: 10.1177/13548565211070409.
A. Fauzi, “Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di Sekolah Penggerak,” Pahlawan J. Pendidikan-Sosial-Budaya, vol. 18, no. 2, hal. 18–22, 2022, doi: 10.57216/pah.v18i2.480.
D. A. Y. A. Rosidah, “Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Discovery Learning,” Semin. Nas. Pendidikan, FKIP UNMA, hal. 306–313, 2014.
Rita Eka Izzaty, Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Yogyakarta: UNY Press, 2016.
R. Kristyowati dan A. Purwanto, “Pembelajaran Literasi Sains Melalui Pemanfaatan Lingkungan,” Sch. J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 9, no. 2, hal. 183–191, 2019, doi: 10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i2.p183-191.
Ichsan, Suhaimi, K. N. Amalia, T. A. Santosa, dan S. Yulianti, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbaisis TPACK Terhadap Ketrampilan Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Siswa Tingkat SD Sampai SMA: Sebuah Meta-Analisis,” J. Pendidik. dan Konseling, vol. 4, no. 5, hal. 2173–2181, 2022.
N. K. Sarini, D. N. Sudana, dan P. N. Riastini, “Hasil Belajar Ipa Kelas IV SD di Gugus II Santalia Melalui Tutor Sebaya,” J. Ilm. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 94, 2018, doi: 10.23887/jisd.v2i2.15486.
C. R. Syafitri dan Mansurdin, “Model Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 4, no. 2, hal. 1335–1346, 2020, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/600.
R. Hermawan, N. Rumaf, dan S. Solehun, “Pengaruh Literasi terhadap Keterampilan Membaca pada Siswa Kelas IV SD Inpres 12 Kabupaten Sorong,” J. Papeda J. Publ. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 2, no. 1, hal. 56–63, 2020, doi: 10.36232/jurnalpendidikandasar.v2i1.411.
L. Leonard, “Kompetensi Tenaga Pendidik di Indonesia: Analisis Dampak Rendahnya Kualitas SDM Guru dan Solusi Perbaikannya,” Form. J. Ilm. Pendidik. MIPA, vol. 5, no. 3, hal. 192–201, 2016, doi: 10.30998/formatif.v5i3.643.
S. Ade, Model-model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2011.
Sopandi. W, “The quality improvement of learning processes and achievements through the read-answer-discuss-explain-and create learning model implementation,” Proceeding 8th Pedagog. Int. Semin. 2017 Enhanc. Pedagog. Cult. Divers. Towar. Excell. Educ., vol. 8, no. 229, hal. 132–139, 2017.
Y. A. Pratama, W. Sopandi, Y. Hidayah, dan M. Trihatusti, “Pengaruh model pembelajaran RADEC terhadap keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa sekolah dasar,” JINoP (Jurnal Inov. Pembelajaran), vol. 6, no. 2, hal. 191–203, 2020, doi: 10.22219/jinop.v6i2.12653.
R. Rina Widiana, Ade Dewi Maharani, “Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA,” J. Ta’dib, vol. 23, no. 1, hal. 87–94, 2020, doi: 10.53682/slj.v3i1.1076.
A. Sudijono, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Magelang: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2000.
F. D. Asriyanti dan L. A. Janah, “Analisis Gaya Belajar Ditinjau dari Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Ilmu Pendidik. J. Kaji. Teor. dan Prakt. Kependidikan, vol. 3, no. 2, hal. 183–187, 2019, doi: 10.17977/um027v3i22018p183.
M. Fridberg, S. Thulin, dan A. Redfors, “Preschool children’s Collaborative Science Learning Scaffolded by Tablets,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 48, no. 5, hal. 1007–1026, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9596-9.
R. Harjanty dan F. Hardianti, “Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Analysis of The Application of STEAM-Based Learning,” vol. 9, no. 2, hal. 112–115, 2020.
R. P. Arbi dan E. Rianto, “The influence of vakt method toward reading ability to learning difficulty children in galuh handayani elementary school,” Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Humanit. Res., vol. 388, no. Icse, hal. 255–257, 2019.
OECD, PISA 2018. Result Combined Executive Summarie. Paris: PISA-OECD Publishing, 2018.
C. Chiu, “The influence of early home literacy activities and home resources for learning on fourth grade students’ reading performance,” Bull. Educ. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 3, hal. 685–706, 2021, doi: 10.6251/BEP.202013_52(3).0009.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.
S. Sukmawati, Salmia, “Population, Sample (Quantitative) and Selection of Participants/Key Informants (Qualitative),” Edumaspul - J. Pendidik., vol. Vol. 7 – N, no. 6, hal. 131–140, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i1.5259.
S. Sukmawati, Sudarmin, “Development of Quality Instrument and Data Collection,” J. Pendidik. dan Pengajaran Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 119–124, 2023.
N. N. Rahmiati Syaf, Husain AS, “Peningkatan Kreativitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Mind Mapping pada Mata Pelajaran IPS pada tingkat SMP,” J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 4, 2022.
I. Maspiroh dan E. K. Eddy Sartono, “Model Pembelajaran Radec (Read, Answer, Discuss, Explan, And Create) Untuk Meningkat Kemampuan Berikir Tingkat Tinggi (High Order Thingking Skill) Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar,” Metakognisi J. Kaji. Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, hal. 82–92, 2022, doi: 10.57121/meta.v4i2.43.
L. Novita, E.Sukmanasa. Creativity and Creative Abilities Among General And Special Education Teachers. International Journal of Management, Innovation, and Education (IJMIE). Vol 2 No 1. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/ijmie/article/view/7761. 2023
DOI: 10.55215/jppguseda.v6i2.8573
Abstract views : 144
views : 118
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
