1. Home
  2. Vol 4, No 2 (2020)
  3. Mujahidin

REREONGAN SERUMPI FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN SITU UDIK VILLAGE BOGOR WEST JAVA

Endin Mujahidin, Bahagia Bahagia, Rimun Wibowo, Fachruddin Majeri Mangunjaya

Abstract


The objective of this research to investigate about rareongan sarumpi for rural development in Situ Udik Village Bogor West Java. The research method used qualitative approach. The data are gathred through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The selection of sample as informant exert purposive sampling technique. The result is the leader of village exert non hierarchy and range between society and chief of village. The impact is leader and society are mutual support. The other is community development in Situ Udik village use bottom-up action like rereongan serumpi for society. The resources come from society and give back again result to society. The other is rereongan serumpi conserve gotong royong as cultural. The implementation of rereongan serumpi utilize mutual cooperation (gotong royong). People applicate togetherness, willing to help another people as well as conserve charity for assisting people. Lastly, rereongan serumpi is related to social capital. Individual and other person in inside group have strong social binding as well as society build social connection outside of local people

Keywords


Rereongan serumpi; Gotong Royong (mutual cooperation); social capital; rural

References


BPS.2016. Statistik Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Jovita, H.D., H. Nashir, D. Mutiarin, Y. Moner & A. Nurmandi (2019): Social capital and disasters: How does social capital shape post-disaster conditions in the Philippines?, Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 7(2): 262-273.

Östh, O.J., M. Dolciotti, A. Reggiani & P. Nijkamp. 2018. Social Capital, Resilience and Accessibility in Urban Systems: a Study on Sweden. Netw Spat Econ 18:313336.

Rosyani., F. Muchlis, D. Napitupulu & H. Faus. (2019). Gotong royong (cooperation) transformation of rural communities in Jambi Province Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah 7 (1):103-110.

Sembel, T., R. Gosal, S. Pangemanan. 2017. Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembangunan desa (studi di desa Sinsingon Barat Kecamatan Passi Timur Kab Upaten Bolaang Mongondow. Jurnal Excecutive 1 (1):1-11.

Yani, T.A. 2017. Pembangunan gampong dengan semangat gotong royong melalui musyawarah dan keterbukaan di kabupaten Aceh Barat. Journal Public Policy 3 (2):150-159.

Pasya, G.K. 2011. Gotong Royong Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Sosietas: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi 1 (1):1-12.

Endro Gunardi. 2016. Tinjauan Filosofis Praktik Gotong Royong. RESPONS 21 (01):89 112.

Wardiat, D. 2016. Dinamika Nilai Gotong Royong Dalam Pranata Sosial Masyarakat Nelayan: Studi Kasus Masyarakat Bulutui Dan Pulau Nain, Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya 18 (1):133-146.

Rolitia, M., Y. Achdiani & W. Eridiana. 2016. Nilai Gotong Royong Untuk Memperkuat Solidaritas Dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Kampung Naga 6 (1):1-17.

Pathak, V., B. Jena, S. Kalra. 2013. Qualitative research. Perspect clin res 4(3):192.

Aspers, P. & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 42, 139- 160.

Busetto, L., W. Wolfgang & C. Gumbinger. 2020. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice 2 (14):1-10.

Busetto, L., Wick, W. & Gumbinger, C. How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and practice. 2 (14):1-10.

Rami, A.A.M.D., R. Abdullah & M.H.A. Simin. 2017. Influence of leadership in rural community development in the state of terengganu, malaysia. Asian Journal For Poverty Studies 3(1): 47 52.

Springer, A., K. Walkowiak & A. Bernaciak. 2020. Leadership Styles of Rural Leaders in the Context of Sustainable Development Requirements: A Case Study of Commune Mayors in the Greater Poland Province, Poland. Sustainability 12 (2676):1-15.

Hermawati, W. 2019. Local Leadership and Microhydro Project Sustainability in Rural Indonesia. Indian Journal of Public Administration 65 (3) 687701.

Markey, Sean, Greg Halseth, and Don Manson. 2012. Investing in Place: Economic Renewal in Northern British Columbia. Vancouver, British Columbia: UBC Press.

EL-Asmar, J.P., Ebohon, J.and Taki, A.H. (2012) Bottom-up approach to sustainable urban development in Lebanon: The case of Zouk Mosbeh. Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society 2 (1): 37-4.

Sylva, S.D. 2017. Taking Back Control: Issues and Benefits of Bottom-up Redevelopment. Procedia Engineering 212: 348355.

Roitman S. (2016). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Strategies for Housing and Poverty Alleviation in Indonesia: The PNPM Programme in Yogyakarta. In: Attia S., Shabka S., Shafik Z., Ibrahim A. (eds) Dynamics and Resilience of Informal Areas. Springer Cham:187-210.

Effendi, T.N. 2013. Budaya Gotong-Royong Masyarakat dalam Perubahan Sosial Saat Ini. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi 2 (1):1-18.

Annamalai, T.R., G. Devkar, A. Mahalingam, S. Benjamin, S.C. Rajan, A. Deep. (2016) What is the evidence on top-down and bottom-up approaches in improving access to water, sanitation and electricity services in low-income or informal settlements? London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London.

Isidiho, A.O., & M.S.B. Sabran. (2016) Evaluating the Top-Bottom and Bottom-Up Community Development Approaches: Mixed Method Approach as Alternative for Rural Un-Educated Communities in Developing Countries. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 7 (4):266-273.

Yun Gao. 2016. Top-down and bottom-up processes for rural development and the role of architects in Yunnan, China. Buildings 6 (47):1-21.

Hikmawati, E., & T. Gutomo. 2015. Bedah Rumah sebagai Bentuk Pengentasan Kemiskinan House Rehabilitation as Poverty Elimination Form. Jurnal PKS 15 (2): 131-144.

Andriana,L., &Manaf.A. 2017. Relevansi Aspek Kemiskinan dan Fisik Lingkungan Kumuh Pada Penentuan LokasiPenerimaProgram KOTAKU (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Pamekasan Kabupaten Pamekasan). Jurnal Pengembangan Kota. Vol 5 (2): 131-139.

Riniati, R. (2017). Analisis Bridging, Linking dan Bonding Social Capital pada Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Masyarakat Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) (Studi Kasus di Desa Kertosari, Kec. Pasrujambe, Kab. Lumajang, Jawa Timur). Jurnal Ekuilibrium 1 (2): 28-35

Taslin & Yusuf. 2017. Nilai-nilai gotong royong dalam pembangunan desa pada masyarakat Siompu (Studi di Desa Karae Kecamatan Siompu Kabupaten Buton Selatan). SELAMI IPS 46 (2):152-163.

Solikatun, Nuning Juniarsih. 2018. Modal sosial sebagai srategi bertahan hidup masyarakat Desa Maria, Kecamatan Wawo, Kabupaten Bima, Provinsi Nusa Tenggarabarat. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi Oktober, 7(2): 262-273

Abdullah, S. (2013). Potensi dan kekuatan modal sosial dalam suatu komunitas. Socious: Jurnal Sosiologi 12 (1):15-21.

La Ola, T., N.I Wianti, M. Tadjuddah. 2020. Bridging dan bonding social capital: analisis relasi sosial masyarakat pulau-pulau kecil di Taman Nasional Wakatobi. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan 08 (01): 30-46.

Riniati., A.Suman, K, Ashar, A. Manzilati. 2017. The role of social capital on information and communication technology based empowerment (Case Study in Kertosari Village, Pasrujambe District, Lumajang Regency). International Journal of Social and Local Economic Governance 3 (2): 69-73.

Bagas & M. Radjab. 2019. Tergerusnya Gotong Royong di Desa Tadang Palie Kecamatan Ulaweng Kabupaten Bone. Hasanuddin Journal of Sociology 1 (2):116-126.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v4i2.2454

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.