PROCESS EVALUATION OF THE KJP PLUS PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AT SMP NEGERI 257 JAKARTA
Abstract
The number of recipients of the KJP Plus program at SMP Negeri 257 Jakarta, which has increased from 2019 to 2020, is one of the factors that requires process evaluation research. The process evaluation uses the Pietrzak theory with a qualitative approach through the purposive sampling technique. The logical framework used includes inputs and activities. The results of this evaluation study are that the process of implementing the KJP Plus program phase 1 in 2021 at SMP Negeri 257 Jakarta has been in accordance with applicable regulations. The findings of this study were that the school empowerment through collaboration with the school committee. The supporting factor for the program was the role of schools that could coordinate and provide personal social services to reach program targets. Meantime, the inhibiting factor in the process was the lack of technological knowledge on program targets which affected the timeliness of file collection. Input to the program, namely the SOP for the implementation of the KJP Plus program, needed to be conveyed to the school so that there was a uniform technical understanding of implementation in the field, thus it achieved program objectives.
Keywords
References
I. R. Adi, Kesejahteraan Sosial: Pekerjaan Sosial, Pembangunan Sosial, Dan Kajian Pembangunan, 2nd ed. Depok: PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, Rajawali Press., 2019.
J. Midgley, Social development: the developmental perspective in social welfare. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage, 1995.
A. Shunhaji, A. Z. Sarnoto, and I. Taufikurrahman, Implementasi Kebijakan Kartu Jakarta Pintar (KJP) dan Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) di MI Tarbiyatul Islamiyah Jakarta Selatan,†Alim J. Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 251276, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.51275/alimv1i2.140.
A. P. Muluk, A. Irbah, and R. M. Bagastama, Analisis Implementasi Kebijakan Kartu Jakarta Pintar (KJP) Plus di DKI Jakarta,†p. 10, 2019.
D. V. Noor, Monitoring dan Evaluasi Kartu Jakarta Pintar (KJP) Plus di Wilayah Jakarta Pusat†vol. 5, p. 7, 2019.
J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd ed. California: SAGE Publication, Inc, 2009.
Pietrzak, Jeanne; Ramler, Malia; Renner, Tanya; Ford, Lucy; Gilbert, Neil, Practical program evaluation: Examples from child abuse prevention, vol. 9. Newburry Park, California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 1990.
L. G. Morra Imas and R. Rist, The Road to Results: Designing and Conducting Effective Development Evaluations. The World Bank, 2009. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7891-5.
E. R. Babbie, The practice of social research, Fourteenth edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning, 2016.
L. Krefting, Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness,†Am. J. Occup. Ther., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 214222, Mar. 1991, doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.3.214.
W. L. Neuman, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, 7th ed. USA: Pearson Education, Inc., 2014.
H. Dunford, Library evaluation: a casebook and can-do guide,†Aust. Libr. J., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 8889, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1080/00049670.2003.10721505.
P. H. Parsaorantua, Y. Pasoreh, and S. A. Rondonuwu, Implementasi Teknologi Iinformasi dan Komunikasi (Studi tentang Web e-government di Kominfo Kota Manado),†no. 3, p. 14, 2017.
C. I. Benazir, Sosialisasi Kebijakan Pendidikan,†academia.edu, p. 10, 2019.
T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite, The international encyclopedia of education, 2nd ed., vol. 6. New York: Elsevier Science, 1994.
Titin, Nuraini, and Supriadi, Peran sekolah sebagai agen sosialisasi dalam pembentukan kepribadian akhlak mulia siswa SMAS,†J. Pendidik. Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, vol. 3, no. 12, p. 13, 2014.
L. J. Kurniawan, O. Sumana, Abdussalam, and Masduki, Negara Kesejahteraan dan Pelayanan Sosial: Perspektif Kebijakan Sosial yang Memberikan Jaminan Perlindungan Warga Negara. Malang: Intrans Publishing, 2015.
S. Al-Samarrai, T. Fasih, A. Hasan, and D. Syukriyah, Assessing the Role of the School Operational Grant Program (BOS) in Improving Education Outcomes in Indonesia,†The World Bank Office Jakarta, Jakarta, AUS4133, Dec. 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.indonesia-investments.com/upload/documents/World-Bank-Bantuan-Operasional-Sekolah-Indonesia-School-Grants-Program-Indonesia-Investments.pdf
A. Khoirul Syani, S. Mufid, and M. Hazin, Komunikasi dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Pendidikan Wajib Belajar 9 Tahun di Kecamatan Ngadiluwih,†KHAZANAH Pendidik., vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.30595/jkpv11i1.2309.
D. Herdiana, Sosialisasi Kebijakan Publik: Pengertian dan Konsep Dasar,†p. 15, 2018.
S. Suryanto, Pemberdayaan Sekolah dan Komite Sekolah (Studi Evaluasi Kebijakan pada Program BOS di kabupaten pacitan),†JPAP J. Penelit. Adm. Publik, vol. 2, no. 01, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.30996/jpapv2i01.713.
A. Fahrudin, Pengantar Kesejahteraan Sosial, 3rd ed. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2018.
R. Yuliana, W. Widayati, and A. Taufiq, Evaluasi pelaksanaan kebijakan Pendidikan gratis pada jenjang sekolah menengah di Kabupaten Sukoharjo,†J. Polit. Gov. Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 261270, 2015.
I. Hanafi and M. Masum, An Analysis Of The Implementation Of The Educational Policy: Role Of The School Committee In The Vocational High Schools,†no. 1, p. 9, 2015.
Y. D. Hadiyat, Digital Divide in Indonesia,†vol. 17, no. 2, p. 10.
A. Istiqomah and P. Suharso, Analisis Partisispasi Pendidikan Pada Masyarakat Miskin Dusun Gumuk Limo Desa Nogosari Kecamatan Rambipuji Kabupaten Jember,†vol. 12, p. 9, 2018.
Darmono, Pengembangan Standard Operating Prosedures (SOP) untuk Perpustakaan Perguruan Umum. Surabaya: UPT UM, 2010.
A. P. Kilis, Penerapan Standar Operasional Prosedur dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Pemerintahan Kecamatan Malalayang Kota Manado,†J. Ilmu Polit., 2015.
DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v5i3.3993
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
