1. Home
  2. Vol 8, No 1 (2024)
  3. Saragih

The Role and Function of the Administrative Court in Resolving Disputes Over Permits for Places of Worship

Yessi Nadia Giatma Saragih, Anna Erliyana

Abstract


In addition to serving as the legality of spatial utilization and urban control, the Building Permit for Places of Worship (IMB Rumah Ibadah) also functions as an assurance of religious harmony as stated in Article 2 and Article 3 of the Joint Regulations of the Minister of Religious Affairs and the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 2006/Number 9 of 2006 on Guidelines for the Implementation of the Duties of Regional Head/Vice Regional Head in Maintaining Religious Harmony, Empowering the People's Forum for Religious Harmony, and Establishing Houses of Worship. Ideally, the establishment of a house of worship that complies with applicable procedures and rules can help avoid conflicts among religious adherents. In reality, there are issues during the establishment of churches that have led to lawsuits in the Administrative Court, such as the rejection of the building permit (IMB) for the Catholic Church of St. Stanislaus Kostka Kranggan and the suspension of the building permit for GKI BaPos Taman Yasmin. The purpose of this article is to examine the function and role of the Administrative Court in resolving disputes related to church permits. The research method used in this study is juridical normative, and the article is analyzed descriptively based on secondary data, namely literature review. The results of this study indicate that the Administrative Court has carried out its function and role in resolving disputes over church permits. However, some decisions cannot be properly executed.

Keywords


roles; functions; administrative courts; permits; disputes; church

References


M. Susanto, “Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Pembelajaran Dari Tren Global,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 18, Pp. 184–203, 2021.

V. H. Situmorang, “Kebebasan Beragama Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Asasi Manusia,” Jurnal Ham, Vol. 10, No. 1, P. 57, Jul. 2019, Doi: 10.30641/Ham.2019.10.57-67.

Budiyono, “Politik Hukum Kebebasan Beragama Dan Berkepercayaan Di Indonesia,” Politik Hukum Kebebasan Beragama, Vol. 2, Pp. 108–119, 2013.

E. Simanjuntak, “Prospek Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Dalam Rangka Memperkuat Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara,” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, Vol. 3, Pp. 163–176, 2014.

E. Hidayat, “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia,” Pp. 80–87, 2020.

Z. Ridlwan, “Negara Hukum Indonesia Kebalikan Nachtwachterstaat,” Fiat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 5, Pp. 141–152, 2012.

D. Puspita, O. S. Matompo, And M. Y. Hasmin, “Peranan Jurusita Pengganti Dalam Pelaksanaan Tugas Pokok Dan Fungsi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Palu),” Pp. 1720–1732, 2020.

Murtiningsih And A. Kusyandi, “Eksistensi Ptun Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Warga Negara Dari Sikap Tindak Administrasi Negara,” Jurnal Yustitia, Pp. 236–248, 2019.

A. Putrijanti, “Jurisprudence Of State Administrative Courts In The Development Of State Administrative Law,” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 21, No. 2, P. 161, Jun. 2021, Doi: 10.30641/Dejure.2021.V21.161-174.

D. Riza, “Pengaturan Terhadap Hakikat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dan Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan,” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 1, Sep. 2018, Doi: 10.23920/Jbmh.V3n1.7.

R. E. W. Rambe, “Pembangunan Rumah Ibadah Di Kota Medan Dalam Konteks Perizinan (Studi Terhadap Peraturan Bersama Menteri Agama Dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 9 Dan Nomor 8 Tahun 2006 Tentang Izin Pembangunan Rumah Ibadah),” Usu Law Journal, Vol. 4, Pp. 151–158, 2016.

Ardiansah, “Legalitas Pendirian Rumah Ibadat Berdasarkan Peraturan Bersama Menteri Agama Dan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 9 Tahun 2006,” Jurnal Toleransi: Media Komunikasi Umat Beragama, Vol. 6, 2010, [Online]. Available:

A. Purijanti, “Kewenangan Serta Obyek Sengketa Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Setelah Ada Uu No. 30 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintah,” Mmh, Pp. 425–430, 2015.

D. R. Pattipawae, “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi,” S A S I, Vol. 25, No. 1, Pp. 92–106, 2019.

K. M. Siregar, “Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia,” Jurnal Al-Maqasid : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan Dan Keperdataan, Vol. 6, Pp. 88–100, 2020.

E. Susanti, “Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Ptun) Sebagai Media Pengawasan Masyarakat Untuk Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Bersih Dan Berwibawa,” 2020.

A. W. Dinata, “Legal Implications Of Non-Compliance With The Decision Of The State Administrative Court In Terms Of The Implementation Of Regional Autonomy And The Unitary State,” Jurnal Hukum Peratun, Vol. 4, No. 1, Pp. 1–30, Mar. 2022, Doi: 10.25216/Peratun.412021.1-30.

B. Kurniawan And S. Hadi, “Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Berdasarkan Asas-Asas Pemerintahan Yang Baik,” Ijlil, Vol. 1, No. 2, Pp. 149–177, Feb. 2021, Doi: 10.35719/Ijl.V1i2.96.

U. Untoro, “Self-Rescpect Dan Kesadaran Hukum Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Keadilan,” Pandecta: Research Law Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, Pp. 37–49, Aug. 2018, Doi: 10.15294/Pandecta.V13i1.7856.

M. K. Akbar, “Peran Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Mewujudkan Pemerintahan Yang Baik,” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Vol. 1, Pp. 352–363, 2020, [Online]. Available:

S. Koraag, R. M. S. Sarapun, And S. Midu, “Terjadinya Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Akibat Dikeluarkannya Keputusan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara,” Lex Administratum, Vol. 9, Pp. 75–85, 2021.

U. Dani, “Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Sistem Unity Of Jurisdiction Atau Duality Of Jurisdiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur Dan Karakteristiknya / Understanding Administrative Court In Indonesia: Unity Of Jurisdiction Or Duality Of Jurisdiction System? A Study Of Hierarchy And Characteristic,” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, Vol. 7, No. 3, P. 405, Dec. 2018, Doi: 10.25216/Jhp.7.3.2018.405-424.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v8i1.8404

Refbacks



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.