Providing Restitution Rights For Child Victims Of Sexual Violence Outside The Prosecutor's Demands

Talita Dinda Artanti, Somawijaya Somawijaya, Ajie Ramdan

Abstract


Although sexual violence often occurs against underage children, not many people understand or are sensitive to this issue. They often perceive it merely as a moral offense rather than a crime against humanity, resulting in repeated victimization of the survivors. One of the efforts that can be made to protect and restore the rights of child victims is through obtaining restitution. However, the implementation and fulfillment of restitution rights are not fully realized in all cases of sexual violence against children. This can happen because there is no obligation for public prosecutors to include restitution in their demands and there is no forced effort to ensure restitution rights. Nevertheless, restitution is a right that should be granted to the child victims, and its application should be maximized in Indonesia's criminal justice system. Judges should rule for additional punishment in the form of restitution even without a request, as restitution is often overlooked. This uncertainty in the legal process regarding restitution implementation does not provide a solution for the loss of restitution rights for child victims of sexual violence. Therefore, other efforts must be undertaken to ensure that child victims of sexual violence receive their rightful restitution.

Keywords


restitution; demand letter; sexual violence; child

References


Ardhito Ramadhan, “Kementerian PPPA: 11.952 Kasus Kekerasan terhadap Anak Terjadi Sepanjang 2021, Mayoritasnya Kekerasan Seksual”, Kompas. 2022

Aryo Putranto Saptohutomo, "Pakar Sebut Restitusi Korban Kekerasan Seksual Dibebankan ke Pemerintah Bentuk "Hukuman" bagi Negara", Kompas. 2022

Bambang Waluyo, Viktimologi, Perlindungan, Korban, dan Saksi, Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2011.

Miszuarty Putri, Pelaksanaan Restitusi bagi Anak yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Sebagai Bentuk Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017, SOUMATERA LAW REVIEW, 2019, Vol. 2.

Ramadhan Yekso Yudanto, Permohonan Restitusi dalam Surat Tuntutan Jaksa Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang,Universitas Brawijaya, 2015.

Putusan Pengadilan Larantuka Nomor 41/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Lr.

Fauzy Marasabessy, Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana : Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 2015, Vol. 45.

M. Yahya Harahap, PEMBAHASAN PERMASALAHAN DAN PENERAPAN KUHAP : Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali (Edisi Kedua), Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2016.

P. Pemerintah. “Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 43 Tahun 2017 tentang Pelaksanaan Restitusi Bagi Anak yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana”

S. Setyaningsih and Y. Suchyadi, “Implementation of Principal Academic Supervision To Improve Teacher Performance in North Bogor,” Jhss (Journal Humanit. Soc. Stud., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 179–183, 2021, doi: 10.33751/jhss.v5i2.3909.


Full Text: PDF

DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v8i1.8801

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.