THE APPLICATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AS A LEGAL GOAL (JUSTICE, UTILITY, CERTAINTY) IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE CENTRAL JAVA HIGH PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Abstract
Keywords
References
Ali, A. (2010). Revealing Legal Theory & Judicial Theory (Judicialprudence) Including Legislation Volume I Initial Understanding. Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.
Hutahaean, A., & Indarti, E. (2019). Investigating Institutions in the Integrated Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Legislation, 16(1), 27–41.
Nikolas, D. L. L. H., & Dewi, S. (2023). Conceptual Basis and Implementation of Restorative Justice by the National Police to Realize the Purpose and Function of the Law (Certainty, Justice and Utility). UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4197–4203.
Rochaeti, N. (2015). Implementation of Restorative Justice and Legal Pluralism in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Legal Matters, 44(2), 150–160.
Sidharta, R. P., & State, T. J. (2010). Judicial Commission Potpourri Hakim's Decision: Between Justice, Legal Certainty, and Utility. Jakarta: Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia.
Sunaryo, T. S. (n.d.). Reconstruction of the concept of crime prevention with traditional value-based criminal law. Legal Matters, 43(2), 240–246.
.
.
DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v9i1.10236
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
















