ADDITIONAL MENU
Cognitive Load Siswa SMP Dalam Pembelajaran Sistem Ekskresi Pasca Pandemi Covid-19
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk memperoleh gambaran bagaimana cognitive load siswa SMP dalam materi sistem ekskresi pada pembelajaran tatap muka terbatas pasca pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian ini dilakukan di salah satu SMP di Kabupaten Bogor Tahun Pelajaran 2021/2022. Cognitive load diukur berdasarkan tiga komponen yaitu usaha mental untuk menggambarkan extraneous cognitive load (ECL), kemampuan menerima dan mengolah informasi yang menggambarkan intrinsic cognitive load (ICL), serta kemampuan penalaran sebagai hasil belajar untuk menggambarkan germane cognitive load (GCL). Usaha mental diukur dengan angket subjective rating scale menggunakan Skala Likert, kemampuan menerima dan mengolah informasi diukur melalui soal sistem ekskresi berdasarkan komponen information processing, dan hasil belajar diukur melalui soal penalaran berdasarkan dimensi penalaran. Hubungan antara ketiga komponen cognitive load dianalisis melalui uji korelasi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa korelasi antara usaha mental dengan kemampuan menerima dan mengolah informasi (UM-MMI) serta korelasi antara usaha mental dengan hasil belajar (UM-HB) menunjukkan nilai negatif dan tidak signifikan. Besarnya nilai korelasi antara kemampuan menerima dan mengolah informasi dengan hasil belajar (MMI-HB) menunjukkan nilai positif dan tidak signifikan. Berdasarkan korelasi antara ketiga komponen tersebut maka cognitive load peserta didik pada materi sistem ekskresi masih berada pada kategori yang tinggi karena korelasi pada setiap komponennya tidak memiliki korelasi yang kuat atau signifikan.
Keywords
Cognitive load, intrinsic cognitive load, extraneous cognitive load, germane cognitive load
References
Arifudin, O. (2022). Optimizing Extracurricular Activities in Fostering Student Character. JIIP-Journal of Scientific Education, 5(3), 829–837.
Arikunto, S. (2006). Research Procedures, Units of Approach and Practice. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Brunken, R., Seufert, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Measuring Cognitive Load. In Plass JL Moreno R., & Brünken, R. (eds.). Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 181 – 202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BSNP. (2006). Content Standards for Elementary and Secondary Education Units [Online]. Available: http://litbang.kemdikbud.go.id/content/BUKUST ~1(4).pdf. [October 1, 2020].
Campbell, N, A., Reece, J, B., & Mitchell, L, G. (2004). Biology Fifth Edition Volume 3. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Chipperfield, B. (2004). Cognitive Load Theory and instructional design. Graduate Student, Educational Communication and technology. University Of Saskatchewan.
Dahar, RW (1989). Learning theories. Jakarta: Erlangga Publisher.
Dede Trie Kurniawan, dan S. M. (2020). Efektivitas Senam Otak (Brain Gym) Dalam Menurunkan Tingkat Kejenuhan Perkuliahan Dari Rumah Selama Masa Pandemi COVID – 19. Journal of Science Education And Practice, 4, 32–40.
Dewi, ZIK (2013). Efforts to Improve Creative Thinking Through Tai Type Cooperative Learning Based on Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Horizon Journal. Vol. 15(2):243-249.
Engzell, P., Frey, A., & Verhagen, MD (2021). Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(17).
Herliandry, LD, Nurhasanah, Suban, ME, and Kaswanto, H. (2020). Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(1): 65-70
Herman, T. (2007). Problem-Based Learning to Improve High-Level Mathematical Thinking Skills of Junior High School Students. Journal Educationist. ISSN : 1907 – 8838. Vol. 1(1).
Live, NH & Serin, LC (2012). Cognitive Burden In Problem-Based Learning. Proceedings of 2012 World Congress, 26-36.
Jong, T, D. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Research, And Instructional Design: Some Food For Thought. Educational Research: Springer. 38:105–134.
Kalyuga, S. (2011). "Informing: A Cognitive Load Perspective". Informing Science: the International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline. 14, 32-45.
Lufri. (2007). Biology Learning Strategy. Padang: UNP Press.
Marzano, R, J., Pickering, D., & Mctighe, J. (1993). Assessing Student Outcomes: Performance Assessment Using the Dimensions of Learning Model. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia USA.
Matlin, Margaret W., (2009). Cognitive Psychology. New Jersey : John Wiley&Son, Inc
Mayasari, A. (2021). Implementation of Information Technology-Based Academic Management Information Systems in Improving the Quality of Learning Services in Vocational High Schools. JIIP-Journal of Scientific Education, 4(5), 340–345.
Mayer, RE, and Moreno, R. (2003). “Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist. 38, (1), 43-52.
Merriënboer, Van. JJG and Sweller, John. (2005). "Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Development and Future Direction". Educational Psychology Reviews. 17, 147-178.
Nuraeni, H. (2014). Learning the diversity of living things uses a science process skills approach that utilizes local potential to improve students' classification skills and logical thinking. (Thesis). Postgraduate Biology Education Study Program. Indonesian education university.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., and Sweller, J. (2003). ”Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Development. Educational Psychologist. 38, (1), 1-4.
Paas, F., Tuovinan, JE, Tabbers, H., and Van Gerven, PWM (2003). "Cognitive Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory". Educational Psychologist. 38, (1), 63-71.
Paas, F, Renkl, A. & Sweller, J (2004). Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1 – 2), 1 – 8.
Rahmat, A & Hindriana, AF. (2014). "Student Cognitive Burden in Learning the Integrated Functions of Plant Structures Based on Learning Dimensions". Journal of Educational Sciences.
Rahmat, A., Soesilawaty, A., Fachrunnisa, R., Wulandari, S., Suryati, Y., & Rohaeni, H. (2014). Cognitive Burden of High School Students in Interdisciplinary Biology Learning Based on Learning Dimensions. National Seminar on Mathematics and Science Education University PGRI Semarang, 23 August 2014.
Rr. Arum Setyorini, Anna Permanasari, D. A. (2021). Problem-Based Learning with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (Stem) Approach to Improve Critical Thinking Skills and Conceptual Understanding of Junior High School Students. Journal of Science Education And Practice, 5(2020), 3–28.
Rustaman, NY, Dirdjosoemarto, S., Yudianto, SA, Subekti, R., Rochintaniawati, D., & Nurjhani, MK (2003). Biology Teaching and Learning Strategies. Bandung: FPMIPA-UPI.
Septiana, R. (2015). Reducing the cognitive load of high school students using framing in plant classification practicum activities based on learning styles. (Thesis). Biology Education. Indonesian education university.
Sofyan, Y. (2020). The Role of Guardian Lecturer Counseling in Increasing Student Learning Motivation at Private Higher Education Region LLDIKTI IV. Journal of Islamic Guidance and Counseling, 10(2), 237–242.
Sukmadinata, N. S, (2011). Educational Research Methods. 7th printing. Bandung: Rosdakarya Youth.
Suraida. (2012). Identification of Green Plants as Biology Learning Media. Edu-Bio Journal. Vol. 3: 55-64.
Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Journal of Cognitive Science. 12: 257-285.
Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive Load Theory: Recent Theoretical Advances, Dalam Plass JL, Moreno R., & Brünken, R. (eds.), Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge: Cambride University Press.
Sweller, J., van Merrie¨nboer, JJG, & Paas, FGWC (1998). Cognitive Architecture And Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Reviews. 10, 251–296.
Syamsiyah, N. (2020). Online Learning During the Corona Pandemic (Studying Activities at Home in Class 4 MI As-Salam Groups). Ibtida': Communication Media Results of Research on Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, 01(02)
Ulfah, U. (2022). Educational Leadership in the Era of Disruption. JIIP-Journal of Scientific Education, 5(1), 153–161.
DOI: 10.33751/jsep.v7i1.6778
Abstract views : 164
views : 102
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 JSEP (Journal of Science Education and Practice)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Email this article 
