The Position Of Proof Of Suspicion In Determining The Status Of Out-Of-Wedlock Children As Biological Children
Abstract
Abstract
This study aims to examine the position of evidence of suspicion as stipulated in Article 1915 of the Civil Code, especially proof to determine the status of out-of-wedlock children as biological children in civil procedure law, and to explore the extent to which the legal system provides protection for the civil rights of out-of-wedlock children who are determined as biological children without a DNA test. The type of research used is normative juridical which is descriptive-analytical, using a legislative approach and a case approach, with data collection techniques through literature studies, and processing qualitatively analyzed data. The results of the study show that evidence of suspicion is legal according to the law and can be used as a basis for judge's consideration if it is supported by the facts. A civil relationship between a child and a biological father can be recognized without a DNA test, simply with other evidence such as communications, witnesses, or indirect confessions at trial. This ensures the child's access to custody, identity, education, inheritance, and alimony. The state plays a role in protecting the rights of children out of wedlock in an inclusive manner and eliminating birth status discrimination. Suspect evidence needs to be strengthened as an alternative to proof if a DNA test is not carried out. The judge is expected to assess indirect facts wisely for the best interests of the child. Regulation, socialization, and training of law enforcement are needed to ensure that proof without DNA tests guarantees the protection of the civil rights of out-of-wedlock children.
Keywords: Evidence of Suspicion, Status of Out-of-wedlock Children, Civil Procedure Law, Civil Rights.
Keywords
References
Bibliography
A. Legislation and Legal Instruments
Indonesia. Civil Code of Indonesia (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata).
Indonesia. Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1945 (Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945).
Indonesia. Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010.
Indonesia. Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage.
Indonesia. Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence.
Indonesia. Law No. 35 of 2014 on the Amendment to Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection.
Indonesia. Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power.
Indonesia. Presidential Regulation No. 96 of 2018 on the Requirements and Procedures for Population Administration and Civil Registration.
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989.
B. Journal Articles
Almihan, Almihan. “Legal Argumentation in Supreme Court Judgments as Instruments for Realizing Fair Decisions.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 2021.
Amaliasari, Rosida. “The Legal Status of Birth Certificates of Children Born Out of Wedlock Naming the Father.” Al-Qanun: Journal of Islamic Legal Thought and Reform 21, no. 2 (2018): 207–224.
Butarbutar, Elisabeth Nurhaini. “Civil Judges’ Freedom in Legal Discovery and the Antinomy in Its Application.” Mimbar Hukum 23, no. 1 (2011): 61–76.
Cahyaningati, Sekar Dias. “Legal and Ethical Review on the Use of DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) Technology in Law Enforcement in Indonesia.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, 2024.
Edyar, Busman. “The Status of Children Born Out of Wedlock According to Positive Law and Islamic Law After the Constitutional Court Decision on Judicial Review of the Marriage Law.” Al-Istinbath: Journal of Islamic Law 1, no. 2 (2016): 181–200.
Febriansyah, Eddo. “Juridical Review of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 on the Inheritance Rights of Children Born Out of Wedlock.” Unnes Law Journal 4, no. 1 (2015).
Hutasoit, Eunike Loist, Fedro Julio Carlos Siagian, Suhaila Zulkifli, and Tajuddin Noor. “Legal Protection for Children Born Out of Wedlock in Indonesia: A Comparative Study of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 and Islamic Law.” Jurisprudensi: Journal of Sharia, Legislation and Islamic Economics 16, no. 2 (2024): 420–437.
Juanda, Enju. “The Strength of Evidence in Civil Cases According to Indonesian Positive Law.” Galuh Justisi: Scientific Journal 4, no. 1 (2016): 27–46.
Kumoro, R. Youdhea S. “Rights and Status of Children Born Out of Wedlock in Inheritance According to the Civil Code.” Lex Crimen 6, no. 2 (2017).
Kurniawan, Muhamad Beni. “Constitutional Court’s Legal Politics on the Status of Children Born Out of Wedlock: The Application of Progressive Law in Protecting Children's Rights.” Jurnal HAM 8, no. 1 (2017): 67–78.
Pancasilawati, Abnan. “Legal Protection of the Civil Rights of Children Born Out of Wedlock.” Fenomena 6, no. 2 (2014): 171–216.
Pandiangan, Hendri Jayadi. “Differences in the Law of Evidence in the Perspective of Criminal and Civil Procedure Law.” TO-RA 3, no. 2 (2017): 565–582.
Prasetya, Untung. “Analysis of the Audi et Alteram Partem Principle in Civil Proceedings (Case No. 20/Pdt.G/2019/PN Pwr).” Amnesti: Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2020): 57–75.
Rangkuti, Afifah. “Analysis of the Legal Status of Children Born Out of Wedlock in Relation to Their Biological Father According to Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU-VII/2010 and Shafi’i Fiqh.” Al-Muqaranah: Journal of Comparative Law and Schools 2, no. 1 (2024).
Rayfindratama, Alva Dio. “Judges’ Freedom in Issuing Court Decisions.” Birokrasi: Journal of Legal and State Administration Sciences 1, no. 2 (2023): 1–17.
Rompas, Esterina Fransi. “Criminal Liability for Child Neglect Perpetrators under Law No. 23 of 2002 Jo Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection.” Lex Administratum 5, no. 2 (2017).
Saepullah, Asep. “The Role of Evidence in Judicial Procedure.” Mahkamah: Journal of Islamic Law Studies 3, no. 1 (2018): 141–157.
Salam, Asep Lukman Daris. “Legal Analysis of the Nasab Rights of Children Born Out of Wedlock According to Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU/VIII/2010.” As-Sakinah: Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 1 (2023): 35–60.
Sari, Novita Dyah Kumala, and S. H. Syafrudin Yudowibowo. “The Evidentiary Value of Presumption as Valid Evidence in Divorce Cases in Religious Courts.” Verstek 4, no. 3 (2016).
Satriyo, Tetes Galih, Kukuh Waladul Ikhsan, Prima Herwiyoso, and Chirstin Octaria Simanjuntak. “International Convention on the Rights of the Child: Influence and Reality in Indonesian Law and Human Rights.” Lentera Ilmu (2024): 70–76.
Septiantoputra, Ryan. “Implementation of the Principle of Child Protection in the Convention on the Rights of the Child for Victims of Domestic Violence.” Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang, 2023.
Subagyono, Bambang Sugeng Ariadi, Johan Wahyudi, and Razky Akbar. “Study of the Application of the Ultra Petita Principle in Ex Aequo et Bono Petitum.” Yuridika 29, no. 1 (2014): 100–112.
Susanto, Muhammad Hajir, Yonika Puspitasari, and Muhammad Habibi Miftakhul Marwa. “The Civil Rights of Children Born Out of Wedlock in Islamic Law Perspective.” Justisi 7, no. 2 (2021): 105–117.
Wahyuningsih, Yuliana Yuli, Iwan Erar Joesoef, Suherman, and Marina Ery Setiyawati. “Socialization of Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection as an Effort to Fulfill the Rights of Children Who Are Victims of Discrimination and Violence.” Jurnal Abdimas Le Mujtamak 2, no. 2 (2022): 100–112.
Wuwungan, Marshanda Niquita, Deasy Soeikromo, and Djefry Welly Lumintang. “Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Cassation Decision Related to the Determination of a Biological Father for Children Born Out of Wedlock (Case No. 1055 K/PDT/2023).” Lex Administratum 12, no. 5 (2024).
Zahra, Khansa Laily Az, Moh Fadwa Mufid Al Amjad, Syafa Nabya Maulidian, Septiani Silvia, and Fadilla Azfa Asyifa. “The Relevance of Evidence in Civil Case Resolution.” The Juris 8, no. 1 (2024): 95–104.
________________________________________
C. Books
Amin, Rahman. Proof Law in Criminal and Civil Cases. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020.
Asnawi, Habib Sulthon, M. Anwar Nawawi, and M. Ag Shi. Dynamics of Marriage Law in Indonesia: A Study of Islamic Family Law on the Legality of Belief-Based Marriages. Yogyakarta: Bildung, 2022.
Efendi, Jonaedi. Reconstruction of Judges’ Legal Reasoning: Based on Legal Values and Justice Living in Society. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.
Fuady, Munir. Theory of Evidence Law (Criminal and Civil). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Civil Procedure Law: Lawsuits, Hearings, Seizures, Evidence, and Court Decisions. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Manalu, Karto. Civil Law on Children Born Out of Wedlock. Batam: Azka Pustaka, 2021.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Indonesian Civil Procedure Law. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.
Sasangka, Hari. Proof Law in Civil Cases for Students and Practitioners. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2005.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamudji. Normative Legal Research: A Brief Overview. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.
Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, A’an Efendi. Legal Research. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2022.
Svinarky, Irene. Important Points to Understand in Indonesian Civil Procedure Law. Batam: Cv Batam Publisher, 2019.
D. Others
Actori In Cumbit Probatio.” Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id/glosarium-hukum/2192-actori-in-combit-probatio. Accessed May 26, 2023.
Yasin, Muhammad. “Simple, Fast, and Low-Cost Judiciary.” Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/peradilan-yang-sederhana--cepat--dan-biaya-ringan-lt5a7682eb7e074/?page=1. Accessed May 1, 2025.
DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i2.12085
Abstract views : 51
views : 19
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
.png alt=)
